2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroporous support coatings for molecular separation membranes having a minimum defect density

Abstract: Bubble number porometry and Hg porosimetry were used to investigate the density and size of percolating channels in gross macroporous support tubes, support tubes coated with one or two macroporous α-alumina layers and the latter coated with a thin mesoporous γ-alumina layer.The key factor in obtaining macroporous thin layers with bulk properties is found in the application of multiple layers rather than the use of a single somewhat thicker layer. The breakthrough pressure of the layered macroporous substrate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cobalt oxide silica thin film layers were coated on ceramic tubular supports 10 cm in length and 1.4 cm external diameter. The manufacturing of these g-alumina supports provided by the Energy Centre of the Netherlands are described elsewhere [43]. These supports have an intrinsic pore size distribution centered w4 nm, with a very low defect density above 10 nm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cobalt oxide silica thin film layers were coated on ceramic tubular supports 10 cm in length and 1.4 cm external diameter. The manufacturing of these g-alumina supports provided by the Energy Centre of the Netherlands are described elsewhere [43]. These supports have an intrinsic pore size distribution centered w4 nm, with a very low defect density above 10 nm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32) However, the average pore size and the largest pore size of a metallic membrane with an asymmetrical pore structure 33) are unambiguously different. One important consideration is that these studies 34) focused on the discrepancies among the average pore size, the largest pore size, and pore size distribution as measured by either mercury porosimetry or capillary flow porosimetry. In the present study, we intended to determine experimentally which method is practically more appropriate when designing a membrane with a specific Darcy's permeability constant and a specific pore size, particularly a ceramic membrane prepared by the sacrificial template method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, supports prepared from α-Al 2 O 3 powders are currently the substrates of choice due to their high porosity and relatively low cost and high mechanical stability. Mesoporous γ-Al 2 O 3 , consisting of much smaller pore sizes of ~4 nm are as used in 2 μm thick intermediate layers, and are able to minimize the defect rate observed [44]. However, γ-Al 2 O 3 exhibits low hydrothermal stability [45], which is of concern if these materials are to be used in applications containing water vapour.…”
Section: Membrane Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%