2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcomes in response to biologic scaffolds with and without a cellular component

Abstract: Recently, macrophages have been characterized as having an M1 or M2 phenotype based on receptor expression, cytokine and effector molecule production, and function. The effects of macrophage phenotype upon tissue remodeling following the implantation of a biomaterial are largely unknown. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of a cellular component within an implanted extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold upon macrophage phenotype, and to determine the relationship between macrophage phenoty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

30
664
3
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 777 publications
(699 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
30
664
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From this standpoint, PDO and PHVBB outperformed PU with regard to the predominance of infiltrating regulatory ED2 macrophages, a phenotype associated with less inflammatory tissue scarring and improved remodelling. 35,36 The enhanced ED2 response to PDO and PHBVV is consistent with our concurrent findings of higher expressions of the anti-inflammatory IL-10 cytokine and MCP-1 chemokine. In contrast, PU was associated with a much greater inflammatory response, with a persisting insulation of the patches and, occasionally, granulomas, which have also been reported in other applications.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…From this standpoint, PDO and PHVBB outperformed PU with regard to the predominance of infiltrating regulatory ED2 macrophages, a phenotype associated with less inflammatory tissue scarring and improved remodelling. 35,36 The enhanced ED2 response to PDO and PHBVV is consistent with our concurrent findings of higher expressions of the anti-inflammatory IL-10 cytokine and MCP-1 chemokine. In contrast, PU was associated with a much greater inflammatory response, with a persisting insulation of the patches and, occasionally, granulomas, which have also been reported in other applications.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As both inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine genes are triggered by LPS and IL-4 (as prototypes of type 1 and type 2 inflammation), the relative activation of inflammatory vs antiinflammatory genes is a better estimate of M1 vs M2 polarization as compared to assessement of single genes. The ratio of M1:M2 cells may be more important than the absolute number [31] . M1 macrophage cells usually have the phenotype showing IL-12 high, IL-10 low, IL-23 high, and M2 cells vice versa [32] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiesse was injected into the myocardium 45 min after ligation in an ovine MI model and analyzed at 4 weeks; injection resulted in a thickened myocardial wall, increased global EF, and reduced LV end systolic volumes compared to controls. Unlike the previously mentioned hydrogel systems that directly bulk the myocardium through hydrogel crosslinking, this approach provides an effective means to induce tissue bulking by promoting the biological response to materials for attenuated LV remodeling and preserved cardiac function [72][73][74][75][76][77].…”
Section: Materials Optimization: Comparing Properties and Introducing mentioning
confidence: 99%