2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrophage inflammatory and regenerative response periodicity is programmed by cell cycle and chromatin state

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This IFN expression heterogeneity is in line with the previous reports (Cai, Zhou et al 2017). To investigate how the host cell state might be affecting the IFN expression, we focused on the cell cycle phase, which has been previously implicated in immune-mediated responses (Genin, Cuvelier et al 2015, Bressy, Droby et al 2019, Daniel, Belk et al 2023). We grouped cells according to their cell cycle phases using gene expression differences that mark S and G2/M phases (Hao, Hao et al 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This IFN expression heterogeneity is in line with the previous reports (Cai, Zhou et al 2017). To investigate how the host cell state might be affecting the IFN expression, we focused on the cell cycle phase, which has been previously implicated in immune-mediated responses (Genin, Cuvelier et al 2015, Bressy, Droby et al 2019, Daniel, Belk et al 2023). We grouped cells according to their cell cycle phases using gene expression differences that mark S and G2/M phases (Hao, Hao et al 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell cycle regulation not only impacts the process of cell division but also inflammatory responses 37,38 . High dNTP levels are detrimental for cells, both due to increased likelihood of parasitisation by DNA viruses and other micro-organisms, and possibly higher rates of spontaneous mutation following DNA damage and repair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These STAT6‐repressed enhancers are also characterized by diminished PU.1 and co‐activator P300 binding and decreased chromatin accessibility following short‐term IL‐4 exposure 56,57 . Intriguingly, it has recently been demonstrated that many direct IL‐4‐STAT6 target genes show distinct IL‐4 inducibility in different cell cycle phases of murine bone marrow‐derived macrophages, raising the possibility that the STAT6 binding or its transcriptional activator capacity is also regulated in a cell cycle‐dependent manner at different enhancer sets 58 …”
Section: Il‐4‐orchestrated Stat6 Egr2 and Pparγ Containing Tf Network...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reported that the attenuated response of the selected genes, including Ccl5 , Irg1, and Irf8 , to IFNγ in the alternatively polarized macrophages proved quite progressive, resulting in almost complete desensitization after the fourth IL‐4 restimulation and thus IFNγ resistance 44 . It has been recently published that macrophage responsiveness to IFNγ markedly reduced in S and G2/M cell cycle phases, while IL‐4 induces the cell cycle phase distribution toward the G2/M phase resulting in the subpopulation‐specific reduced IFNγ responsiveness in the IL‐4 polarized macrophage populations 58 . Besides, we observed that the direct transcriptional repressor activity of the STAT6 transcription factor also affects the specific subset of the inflammatory enhancers attenuating both their basal activity and TLR their inducibility by TLR ligand LPS.…”
Section: Il‐4‐induced Tf Network Supports the Unique Responsiveness O...mentioning
confidence: 99%