2019
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aav5086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrophage centripetal migration drives spontaneous healing process after spinal cord injury

Abstract: Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) brings numerous inflammatory cells, including macrophages, from the circulating blood to lesions, but pathophysiological impact resulting from spatiotemporal dynamics of macrophages is unknown. Here, we show that macrophages centripetally migrate toward the lesion epicenter after infiltrating into the wide range of spinal cord, depending on the gradient of chemoattractant C5a. However, macrophages lacking interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) cannot migrate toward the epicent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…M2 macrophages may also enhance the polarization of reactive astrocytes after SCI (Sonn et al, 2019). Inhibition of the centripetal migration of macrophages impairs the migration of astrocytes and glial scar formation, resulting in exacerbated neuronal loss and decreased functional recovery (Kobayakawa et al, 2019). However, excessive macrophage activity also contributes to damaging cascade reactions, secondary damage and axonal dieback (Evans et al, 2014).…”
Section: Macrophagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M2 macrophages may also enhance the polarization of reactive astrocytes after SCI (Sonn et al, 2019). Inhibition of the centripetal migration of macrophages impairs the migration of astrocytes and glial scar formation, resulting in exacerbated neuronal loss and decreased functional recovery (Kobayakawa et al, 2019). However, excessive macrophage activity also contributes to damaging cascade reactions, secondary damage and axonal dieback (Evans et al, 2014).…”
Section: Macrophagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the CNS cells in the neurovascular unit and blood-borne peripheral cells constantly modulate the BSCB and influence its breakdown and repair after SCI [ 11 ], however, a significant amount of research in the past few years has focused on the effects of astrocytes and pericytes on BSCB homeostasis, yet the role of macrophages/microglia in the BSCB has been seldom defined. Current data indicate that a large number of peripheral macrophages will enter the injured spinal cord and trigger a cascade of responses after SCI [ 12 ]. It was showed that macrophages have two polarization states including “classically-activated”, proinflammatory, cytotoxic M1 phenotype and “alternatively-activated”, anti-inflammatory, pro-repair M2 phenotype [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of their therapeutic potential, there are some obvious disadvantages associated to the use of MSCs in the treatment of SCI. Specifically, the survival rate of the transplanted stem cells is very low due to severe inflammatory responses or other factors in the injured microenvironment [ 10 12 ]. Additionally, the scar-forming gliosis prevents the integration, differentiation, and axon outgrowth of grafted stem cells in the lesion area [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%