2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrophage Activation and Polarization: Nomenclature and Experimental Guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
716
3
13

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 507 publications
(751 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
19
716
3
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Newly recommended guidelines for the nomenclature of the macrophage activation process are based on three principles: source of macrophages, definition of activators and a consensus collection of markers to describe macrophage activation [23]. On the basis of these guidelines, the human CD16 + CD163 + MerTK + pSTAT3 + activation program described in this study within the TB context is reasonably related to the proposed "M(IL-10)" nomenclature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Newly recommended guidelines for the nomenclature of the macrophage activation process are based on three principles: source of macrophages, definition of activators and a consensus collection of markers to describe macrophage activation [23]. On the basis of these guidelines, the human CD16 + CD163 + MerTK + pSTAT3 + activation program described in this study within the TB context is reasonably related to the proposed "M(IL-10)" nomenclature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monocytes conditioned with cmMTB differentiated into cells displaying an equivalent or low- er expression of M1 polarization markers (i.e., CD86, HLA-DR, FCAR and Serpine1) compared with cells differentiated in the presence of cmCTR (Supplementary information, Figure S1A-S1B). By contrast, the expression of markers related to M2 macrophage activation, such as CD16, CD163, MerTK, CD206, AMAC1 and CD200R1 [23][24][25][26][27], was upregulated in cmMTB-conditioned cells ( Figure 1B, Supplementary information, Figure S1B). Similarly, the expression of CCR2 and CCR5 chemokine receptors was higher in the presence of cmMTB, supporting the acquisition of the M2 program (Supplementary information, Figure S1C) [28,29].…”
Section: Differentiation Of Human Monocytes Towards An M2-like Activamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to macrophages, neutrophil polarization probably exists as a spectrum of activation states, rather than only two extremes. We suggest that researchers should follow the recent advances in the macrophage field and apply a combinatorial nomenclature that describes neutrophil activation status 99 .…”
Section: Tumor-induced Neutrophil Polarization and Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adherent monocytes were cultured in the presence of 4 ng/mL colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) to generate monocyte-derived macrophages, hereby referred to as M(CSF-1) in accordance with the recently published macrophage nomenclature guidelines. 22 They were cultured for 4 days in Iscove's Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) containing 10% autologous serum and prepared by recalcification of platelet-rich plasma (12-well plates, 37 C in 5% CO 2 ). M(CSF-1) were exposed to DMSO…”
Section: Human Peripheral Blood Monocyte Isolation and Macrophage Difmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A tenth of mouse peritoneal macrophages (10.14 AE 6.41) and a quarter of lesion resident macrophages (24.82 AE 5.57) were immunopositive for ERa ( Figure 1, J and K), with all GFP þ cells being immunopositive for ERb ( Figure 1L). Human peripheral blood monocytes were isolated and differentiated into macrophages that are classified as being at the alternative end of the macrophage activation spectrum 22 Migration score was based on percentage cells mobilized and distance migrated. Macrophages; n Z 4 patients, embryonic rat DRGs; n Z 4 pregnant dams.…”
Section: Erb Is the Predominant Er Expressed By Lesion-resident Macromentioning
confidence: 99%