2013
DOI: 10.1002/mren.201370015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macromol. React. Eng. 6/2013

Abstract: Cover: A strategy to reliably reconstruct 3D images of porous polyolefin particles using X‐ray microtomography is presented. Polyolefins exhibit low absorptivity for X‐rays, hence they represent challenging samples for mCT imaging. Exploration of the influence of scanning/reconstruction settings on the resulting polymer morphology and transport characteristics allows the generation of these cross‐sectional images of polyethylene and polystyrene particles, shown with different smoothing parameters. Further deta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of samples can be imaged under ambient conditions at 2D and 3D spatial resolutions of up to 150 nm and 170 nm, respectively [33–35] . Specifically in the context of supported olefin polymerization catalysts, the technique delivers comprehensive information on the extent and magnitude of large‐scale fragmentation phenomena (i. e., crack formation and propagation) and the 3D structure and phase distribution of individual particles [2,4,36,37] – more so than other laboratory‐based techniques such as SEM, which only yields 2D information [11,17,19,38–42] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of samples can be imaged under ambient conditions at 2D and 3D spatial resolutions of up to 150 nm and 170 nm, respectively [33–35] . Specifically in the context of supported olefin polymerization catalysts, the technique delivers comprehensive information on the extent and magnitude of large‐scale fragmentation phenomena (i. e., crack formation and propagation) and the 3D structure and phase distribution of individual particles [2,4,36,37] – more so than other laboratory‐based techniques such as SEM, which only yields 2D information [11,17,19,38–42] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last but not least, laboratory‐based computed tomography (CT), an absorption contrast‐based technique, represents an accessible alternative to synchrotron‐based methods for characterizing pristine and polymerized catalyst particles [28,48,64–66] . Nano‐computed tomography (nanoCT) has been reported to deliver sub‐180 nm resolutions for different silica‐supported olefin polymerization catalysts (Figure 8), as determined via Fourier shell correlation analysis (FSC) [48] .…”
Section: Assessing the Morphology And Activity Of Supported Olefin Po...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10,12,18] The phenomenon is called replication. In some investigations on heterogeneous polymerization of olefins, the bulk of the particles appeared dense, [12,17,18] while in other cases, it was porous, [7,24,25] however, porosity decreased with time for both porous and dense particles. Researchers have also found out for porous polymer particles that there are always wide macrocracks extended from surface to the center of the particles.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/mren202100021mentioning
confidence: 99%