2010
DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201090029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macromol. Biosci. 12/2010

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanical and adhesion properties of our hydrogels could be tailored and optimized by balancing covalent cross‐linking via PEGdiacrylate, physical cross‐linking via charged silicate nanoplatelets, and entanglements/mechanical interlocking via dangling PEG chains. The results suggest that these elastomeric and adhesive hydrogels have potential for development as biomaterials for tissue engineering matrixes as they are non‐toxic and also bioadhesive to mammalian cells 28, 31. These materials can also be optimized for use as sealants and wound dressings, for hydrogel bandages and adhesive components of medical devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mechanical and adhesion properties of our hydrogels could be tailored and optimized by balancing covalent cross‐linking via PEGdiacrylate, physical cross‐linking via charged silicate nanoplatelets, and entanglements/mechanical interlocking via dangling PEG chains. The results suggest that these elastomeric and adhesive hydrogels have potential for development as biomaterials for tissue engineering matrixes as they are non‐toxic and also bioadhesive to mammalian cells 28, 31. These materials can also be optimized for use as sealants and wound dressings, for hydrogel bandages and adhesive components of medical devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The resulting networks could withstand uniaxial extensions up to 2 000%, indicating that the hydrogel networks can absorb appreciable amounts of energy during deformation. While several studies found that PEG silicate hydrogels support cell growth,30, 31 we discovered that certain formulations showed significant adhesion to surfaces such as metal (13 kPa adhesive strength), glass, plastic and skin 28. Based on these preliminary results, here we present a systematic approach to determine how the mechanical and adhesive properties can be tailored for use as a tissue engineering matrix, wound dressing and pressure sensitive adhesive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In our previous studies we have shown that the cell numbers reached in the plateau phase of the cell growth curves were not a result of contact inhibition between cells 2, 11, 41. Instead, growth inhibition was found to be dependent on the number and distribution of “cell repellant” PEO and “cell adhesive” silicate regions on the nanocomposite films 2, 11, 41. Similar effects are found in the cell growth experiments on fiber surfaces showing that cells are not confluent (Figure 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The fibroblast cells adhesion was increased with the higher silica NPs concentration or with higher PEO crystals in the NC hydrogel films. The effect of silica NPs concentration on swelling properties of hydrogel was observed as well …”
Section: Nanocomposite Hydrogels Of Nanomaterials As Biomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%