2012
DOI: 10.1899/11-120.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroinvertebrate size–mass relationships: how specific should they be?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, Methot et al. ). We dried (60°C for 48 h) and weighed taxa for which there was no published equation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Methot et al. ). We dried (60°C for 48 h) and weighed taxa for which there was no published equation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aquatic invertebrates were identified to family or genus and counted. Dry weight of aquatic invertebrates in the diet were estimated with equations from Benke et al (1999) andM ethot et al (2012). Mean morphological measurements of aquatic invertebrates (body length, shell width) were calculated from subsamples of 20 individuals per taxon randomly selected from brown trout diets and used to estimate dry weight.…”
Section: Diet Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomass estimated from head widths using size–mass relationships from Methot et al. . White shaded bars denote damselfly abundance in the absence of fish, gray shaded bars denote damselfly abundance in the presence of fish, and black bars denote chironomid abundance in the respective fish treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated biomass of larval damselflies and chironomidae from benthic samples by measuring head widths and using published size–mass relationships (Methot et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%