2020
DOI: 10.1080/1331677x.2020.1820360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroeconomic performance of countries across monetary policy regimes from 2000 to 2017

Abstract: The goal of the article is to compare macroeconomic performance of 27 advanced and emerging OECD countries through the lens of their monetary policy frameworks. We find no advantage of the euro area countries and countries whose central banks follow a dual mandate in inflation and output stabilisation as compared to full-fledged inflation targeters including strongly inflationaverse central banks. The study contributes to the unresolved discussion on optimal monetary policy after the Great Recession. The novel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds with the recent international evidence in favour of inflation targeting for both emerging and industrial economies, in the context of shock absorbing properties (Fratscher, Grosse-Steffen and Rieth, 2020), favourable conditions for capital inflows (Mollick, Torres and Carneiro, 2011), and stability of the banking system in countries with average quality of institutions (Fazio et al, 2018). However, there are empirical studies showing a very weak or non-existent support for inflation targeting (Petreski, 2014;Ryczkowski and Ręklewski, 2021). Among several disadvantages of inflation targeting, unfavourable output effects, inability to influence inflation expectations and ignorance of exchange rate levels are frequently mentioned (Ayres, Belasen and Kutan, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This corresponds with the recent international evidence in favour of inflation targeting for both emerging and industrial economies, in the context of shock absorbing properties (Fratscher, Grosse-Steffen and Rieth, 2020), favourable conditions for capital inflows (Mollick, Torres and Carneiro, 2011), and stability of the banking system in countries with average quality of institutions (Fazio et al, 2018). However, there are empirical studies showing a very weak or non-existent support for inflation targeting (Petreski, 2014;Ryczkowski and Ręklewski, 2021). Among several disadvantages of inflation targeting, unfavourable output effects, inability to influence inflation expectations and ignorance of exchange rate levels are frequently mentioned (Ayres, Belasen and Kutan, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%