2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroeconomic impacts of climate change mitigation in Latin America: A cross-model comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the allocation of carbon tax revenue back into the country's economy as subsides to the representative consumer is not possible in Colombia, as 75 % of this income is going to be invested in rural development projects [12], that, even when they can be environmentally sustainable, would not impact heavily in the energy matrix. In [29], it is shown how only with a carbon tax around 165 EUR/tonne would the country see an emission abatement of 60 % but the effect on GDP varies from one model to another. It is also mentioned that to achieve the best results, the carbon tax should also be applied to fossil fuel exports, (which are currently excluded of [30]), resulting in a decline of coal expo rts, just to recover around 2040 when carbon capture and storage (CCS) had been deployed for electricity production from coal [29].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, the allocation of carbon tax revenue back into the country's economy as subsides to the representative consumer is not possible in Colombia, as 75 % of this income is going to be invested in rural development projects [12], that, even when they can be environmentally sustainable, would not impact heavily in the energy matrix. In [29], it is shown how only with a carbon tax around 165 EUR/tonne would the country see an emission abatement of 60 % but the effect on GDP varies from one model to another. It is also mentioned that to achieve the best results, the carbon tax should also be applied to fossil fuel exports, (which are currently excluded of [30]), resulting in a decline of coal expo rts, just to recover around 2040 when carbon capture and storage (CCS) had been deployed for electricity production from coal [29].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [29], it is shown how only with a carbon tax around 165 EUR/tonne would the country see an emission abatement of 60 % but the effect on GDP varies from one model to another. It is also mentioned that to achieve the best results, the carbon tax should also be applied to fossil fuel exports, (which are currently excluded of [30]), resulting in a decline of coal expo rts, just to recover around 2040 when carbon capture and storage (CCS) had been deployed for electricity production from coal [29]. Furthermore, it is established that carbon tax value is 5 EUR/tCO2 and it will be increased annually by 10 % until reaching 10 EUR$/tonCO2, when a tax reform for this should be implemented again [29].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…13 E3ME had been successfully applied previously by Cambridge Econometrics to assess energy and climate policies for institutions such as the European Commission [27], the Irish and UK Governments [28], Renewable UK [29]. Other examples of recent applications of E3ME include: [18][19][20][30][31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%