2020
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2020.1826399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroeconomic forecasting for Pakistan in a data-rich environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, it published the YOY and MOM inflation series based on the CPI indices, available only from 2016:07 in the ED. Second, we use the QIM as a measure of output/GDP or output/GDP growth as almost all studies that have used monthly datasets to forecast inflations, or any other macroeconomic variable in a multivariate setting for Pakistan, have used the same variable to proxy for output/GDP [see Syed & Lee (2021), Hussain, et al (2018), Hussain & Mahmood (2017) and Hanif & Malik (2015)]. However, the base of this measure was revised from 2005-06 to 2015-16 by the PBS on January 19, 2022.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, it published the YOY and MOM inflation series based on the CPI indices, available only from 2016:07 in the ED. Second, we use the QIM as a measure of output/GDP or output/GDP growth as almost all studies that have used monthly datasets to forecast inflations, or any other macroeconomic variable in a multivariate setting for Pakistan, have used the same variable to proxy for output/GDP [see Syed & Lee (2021), Hussain, et al (2018), Hussain & Mahmood (2017) and Hanif & Malik (2015)]. However, the base of this measure was revised from 2005-06 to 2015-16 by the PBS on January 19, 2022.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have indicated that using machine-learning to forecast key macroeconomic variables such as inflation, output or GDP growth, and key interest rates, has become a recent and recurring trend [see Eickmeier & Ng (2011), Li & Chen (2014), Panagiotelis, et al (2019), Syed & Lee (2021), Mederios, et al (2021), among others]. These techniques are generally capable of handling a large amount of data and outperform the commonly used univariate and multivariate econometric models (inclusive of the dynamic factor model, which can handle a large amount of data) (Mederios, et al (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we use several classical econometric models taken from Hanif & Malik (2015) and compare their forecasting accuracy against the DFM and ML models. We follow Syed & Lee (2021) in explaining the general methodology for forecasting used in this paper. We initiate our analysis by using the simple mean model (naïve), the AR, the ARDL models, the structural VAR models followed by the DFM, and the sophisticated machine learning techniques such as the Ridge (Ridge), the LASSO, the elastic net (EN), artificial neural network (ANN) and the RF.…”
Section: Forecasting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It usually produces more accurate solutions than a single model would. They two most well-known methods in ensemble learning are bagging [16] This model is generated using the same machine learning algorithm with n random observations of m sub-samples of the original dataset using the bootstrap sampling method. The second step is aggregating the result generated from these models.…”
Section: A Ensemble Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A false or inaccurate hypothesis can be improved if the training dataset for the learning algorithm is insufficient. The most well-known methods in ensemble learning are bagging and clustering [16]- [19] and boosting [20]. These algorithms achieve sufficient classification results and are commonly used to generate numerous ensemble models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%