2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2017.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroeconomic Dynamics in Korea during and after the Global Financial Crisis: A Bayesian DSGE Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the model includes a calibration for the domestic investment weight (ν) of heterogeneous intermediate goods manufacturers of 0.75, following Woo [101], and an exchange rate elasticity of export demand (ϱ) of 1, as identified by Shim (2023). The consumption habit parameter (Ω) is set at 0.65, drawing from the research by Kang and Suh [102], while the labor elasticity of substitution (n) is calibrated at 1.5, following Hur and Rhee [103]. According to He and Lee [104], the interest rate persistence parameter (ρ ), inflation gap (ω ), and output gap (ω ) in the Taylor rule of monetary policy are calibrated to 0.75, 2.51, and 0.4, respectively.…”
Section: Parameter Calibration and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the model includes a calibration for the domestic investment weight (ν) of heterogeneous intermediate goods manufacturers of 0.75, following Woo [101], and an exchange rate elasticity of export demand (ϱ) of 1, as identified by Shim (2023). The consumption habit parameter (Ω) is set at 0.65, drawing from the research by Kang and Suh [102], while the labor elasticity of substitution (n) is calibrated at 1.5, following Hur and Rhee [103]. According to He and Lee [104], the interest rate persistence parameter (ρ ), inflation gap (ω ), and output gap (ω ) in the Taylor rule of monetary policy are calibrated to 0.75, 2.51, and 0.4, respectively.…”
Section: Parameter Calibration and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in the impulse response function results section, we conducted a comparative analysis with the results of Macera and Divino [21]. Moreover, a significant amount of literature focus on building small open economy models for South Korea (see, Bae [22], Kim [23], Choi and Hur [24], Yie and Yoo [25], and Kang and Suh [26]). These works offer us model structures and parameter values suited to the South Korean economy, the details of which are explained in the sections on model introduction and parameter calibration.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Follow Yie and Yoo [27], the discount factor (β) is 0.988. Following Kang and Suh [28], the capital share in production (γ) is 0.33. Following Hur and Rhee [29], the depreciation rate (δ) is 0.025.…”
Section: Parameter Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Torres [33], the auto-regressive coefficient of home productivity (ρ h ) is 0.95 with a standard deviation of 0.01. Following Kim [34], Kang and Suh [28], and Hur and Lee [35], the consumption tax rate (τ 1 t ) is 0.1; the labor tax rate (τ 2 t ) is 0.095; and the capital tax rate (τ 3 t ) is 0.219. Following the South Korea Government Budget, the fiscal deficit ratio (φ t ) is 0.061.…”
Section: Parameter Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%