2009
DOI: 10.4257/oeco.2009.1303.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroecologia, biogeografia e áreas prioritárias para conservação no cerrado

Abstract: grupos indicadores pode ser importante para minimizar problemas gerados pela falta de conhecimento. Assim, essa abordagem é interessante em um cenário de grandes incertezas (ausência de dados detalhados) e de rápida transformação da paisagem, possibilitando a otimização de estudos em grandes escalas e depois transferir os resultados para escalas espaciais mais locais e realmente relevantes para a conservação. nessas regiões, podem ser realizados, em um segundo momento, estudos mais detalhados a fim de avaliar … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
11
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern has also been recorded for other taxonomic groups, such as for amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals (Diniz-Filho et al 2009). However, in the transition zones between biomes, there is great opportunity for the appearance of species from other biomes, that produces a high beta diversity in ecotones, as was observed between the Caatinga and the Cerrado (Castro et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…This pattern has also been recorded for other taxonomic groups, such as for amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals (Diniz-Filho et al 2009). However, in the transition zones between biomes, there is great opportunity for the appearance of species from other biomes, that produces a high beta diversity in ecotones, as was observed between the Caatinga and the Cerrado (Castro et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…At a global scale the Cerrado is considered a biodiversity hotspot (Myers et al, 2000). For over six decades, much of its natural vegetation has been replaced by pastures and row crops (Diniz-Filho et al, 2009). The removal of the riparian vegetation increases erosion, turbidity and bed sedimentation, water temperature and the abundance of aquatic macrophytes, leading to habitat simplification and affecting the distribution, richness and abundance of aquatic macroinvertebrates (Chapman and Chapman, 2002;Kaufmann et al, 2009;Hughes et al, 2010;Kaufmann and Faustini, 2012).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aquatic environments are altered by a variety of external factors, including those of natural origin, such as floods and droughts, and also by anthropogenic ones, such as the construction of dams, urbanization, monoculture and pasture systems (Malmqvist & Rundle, ; Pompeu et al , ; Cunico et al , ; Barletta et al , ). In the Cerrado, which is the second major Brazilian biome, the main threats to biodiversity are related to two economic activities: intensive grain monoculture and extensive cattle ranching (Diniz‐Filho et al , ). These two activities have great potential for altering aquatic communities because they may trigger a series of effects that adversely affect aquatic ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%