2013
DOI: 10.4072/rbp.2013.2.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrochorobates scalabrinii (Moreno & Mercerat) (Cingulata, Dasypodidae) en el Mioceno tardío de la Provincia de San Juan (Argentina). Implicancias biocronoestratigráficas y paleobiogeográficas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Osteoderms of JUY-P-0090 and JUY-P-0033 (previously described by Zurita et al, 2017) differ from Macrochorobates chapalmalensis in: (1) larger size; (2) the central figure of mobile osteoderms have a less acute posterior angle; and (3) the more convex peripheral figures of the fixed osteoderms. As reported by Moreno and Mercerat (1891) and Contreras et al (2013), two other characteristics of Macrochorobates scalabrinii observed in this material are: (1) in some mobile osteoderms, very shallow, barely distinguishable furrows divide the lateral figures into two parts; and (2) piliferous foramina are present on the posterior and both lateral margins, are variable in number, and form a single row.…”
Section: Systematic Paleontologysupporting
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Osteoderms of JUY-P-0090 and JUY-P-0033 (previously described by Zurita et al, 2017) differ from Macrochorobates chapalmalensis in: (1) larger size; (2) the central figure of mobile osteoderms have a less acute posterior angle; and (3) the more convex peripheral figures of the fixed osteoderms. As reported by Moreno and Mercerat (1891) and Contreras et al (2013), two other characteristics of Macrochorobates scalabrinii observed in this material are: (1) in some mobile osteoderms, very shallow, barely distinguishable furrows divide the lateral figures into two parts; and (2) piliferous foramina are present on the posterior and both lateral margins, are variable in number, and form a single row.…”
Section: Systematic Paleontologysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Radiometric dating for this unit estimated the age to be between 7.14 and 5.59 Ma (Marshall and Patterson, 1981; Latorre et al, 1997; Reguero and Candela, 2011; Bonini et al, 2017). This species has also been cited for the Epecuén Formation (Huayquerian SALMA), Buenos Aires Province (Scillato-Yané, 1980, 1982); Cerro Azul Formation (Huayquerian SALMA), La Pampa Province (Esteban et al, 2001; Urrutia et al, 2008); Salicas Formation, La Rioja Province (Tauber, 2005; Brandoni et al, 2012); and Las Flores Formation, San Juan Province (Contreras, 2007; Contreras et al, 2013) in which the fossil-bearing level is between 6.9 and 6.3 Ma (Ré et al, 2003). According to Tonni et al (1998) and Cione and Tonni (2005), the occurrence of Macrochorobates scalabrinii in the sediments overlying the Arroyo Chasicó Formation, Buenos Aires Province, allowed assignment of these levels to the Macrochorobates scalabrinii Biozone as the biostratigraphic base for the early Huayquerian Age/Stage.…”
Section: Systematic Paleontologymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations