“…Visual-based HPR systems, such as the ones described in [1,2,6], are quite accurate, inexpensive and unobtrusive, but they are not suitable for ambulatory monitoring during daily life activities. In contrast, glove-based HPR devices, relying on off-the-shelf flex sensors [3,10], dielectric elastomer stretch sensors [11], optical fibers [12], or inertial measurement units [4], are intrinsically ambulatory, but they are often less usable than visual-based systems due to obtrusive wiring and rigid sensor technology that does not adapt to the dynamically changing hand shape of the users. Indeed, the human body, and the human hand in particular, have a high number of degrees of freedom (DOFs) that act on a continuously compliant structure.…”