2018
DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2018.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macro-scale grid-based and subbasin-based hydrologic modeling: joint simulation and cross-calibration

Abstract: Watershed hydrologic models often possess different structures and distinct methods and require dissimilar types of inputs. As spatially-distributed data are becoming widely available, macro-scale modeling plays an increasingly important role in water resources management. However, calibration of a macro-scale grid-based model can be a challenge. The objective of this study is to improve macro-scale hydrologic modeling by joint simulation and cross-calibration of different models. A joint modeling framework wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variable thresholds for HADI and SHADI were close. This result was in accordance with the finding by Bazrkar & Chu (2021), where the output from a grid-based hydrologic model (GHM) (Chu et al 2019) in a different study period (2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007) was used. The clustering method was used to derive these variable thresholds based on the probabilities of occurrences of those values considering both spatial and temporal distributions of droughts.…”
Section: Selection Of the Best Categorization Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The variable thresholds for HADI and SHADI were close. This result was in accordance with the finding by Bazrkar & Chu (2021), where the output from a grid-based hydrologic model (GHM) (Chu et al 2019) in a different study period (2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007) was used. The clustering method was used to derive these variable thresholds based on the probabilities of occurrences of those values considering both spatial and temporal distributions of droughts.…”
Section: Selection Of the Best Categorization Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Figure 5 a indicates that CS1 did not provide accurate estimates of peak flows for both calibration and validation periods. Other studies have also highlighted that the traditional calibration of the SWAT model may not be able to provide satisfactory simulations of peak flows in the RRB [ 48 ]. In contrast, if the wet and dry years were separated for model calibration (i.e., CS2), a significant improvement was achieved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to other SWAT studies for depression-dominated areas, 25 SWAT parameters were selected for sensitivity analysis [ 17 , 28 , 48 ]. The most sensitive water quantity and quality parameters were selected for evaluating the impacts of different calibration schemes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The normal spatial interoperation may not represent the features that may have important impacts on the local climate. The scale mismatch problem can be overcome by using Regional Climate Model (RCM) or by using the Statistical Downscaling techniques [2,[20][21][22]. The RCM develops a finer resolution regional climate model that is driven by boundary conditions simulated by the global GCMs at coarser scales.…”
Section: Applied Environmental Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%