Macro-Economic Development of the Eu Countries in the Context of Performance and Competitiveness of Smes

Abstract

Purpose – The paper focuses on the identification of disparities in the development of the macroeconomic environment across the member states of the European Union and problematic factors impacting the business environment’s level. Research methodology – To find the disparities in the development of the EU countries, the TOPSIS method was used. Based on this analysis, the crucial factors influencing the development of the macroeconomic environment were determined. The discriminant analysis was then used to form a model, which could help assess and examine the relationship between the business environment and significant determinants of development. Findings – Based on the methods applied, the determinants influencing the development of the macroeconomic environment and key factors and aspects affecting the rate of development of the economic and business environment were identified and the analysis of the economic and business environment was performed through selected statistical techniques. Practical implications – The analysis confirmed that some countries have certain gaps in its assessment of the dynamics of economic development in EU countries in terms of the sustainability and competitiveness of small and medium-sized businesses, and that the business climate is not entirely conducive to these businesses. Originality/Value – The additional value of the paper is the formation of the model, which helps identify the countries with appropriate business environment and those where the economic development is not sufficiently developed which may be useful for enterprises, investors, and creditors.

The Relevance of Sectoral Clustering in Corporate Debt Policy: The Case Study of Slovak Enterprises

“…Currently, when the economies of different countries around the world are experiencing adverse developments, mostly due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the war in Ukraine, or the energy crisis, overcoming a difficult period of business management is crucial. Along with measuring corporate performance (e.g., in terms of sustainable growth rate- Bagh et al 2023, of sustainable development-Cris , an-Mitra et al 2016Cris , an-Mitra et al 2020, or of debt level- Gajdosikova et al 2023), this process also includes assessing the achieved results from the point of view of financial health, evaluating the methods used to measure performance, and fulfilling long-term corporate objectives for the future (Valaskova and Nagy 2023). Using these methods and procedures, firms are able to obtain and subsequently evaluate data that reflect not only the dynamics of corporate development but also quantify the impact of the economic crisis on changes in the structure of financial indicators over the years and formulate proposals and recommendations for the future 2 of 30 (Stratone 2023).…”

Transparency and trust in the public sector: Target and benchmarks to ensure macroeconomic stability

“…The concept of macroeconomic stability is a complex, multifaceted category, characterized by a multilevel structure, the presence of complex multilateral relationships, complexity and certain uncertainty of functioning conditions. A significant list of objects and subjects of management significantly complicates the procedures for managing macroeconomic stability, ensuring the coherence of the functioning of its individual components, delimiting functions and powers between its institutions and, in general, reduce the effectiveness of its functioning (Kot & Paradowski, 2022;Litovseva et al, 2022;Kharazishvili & Kwilinski, 2022;Lyeonov et al, 2021a;Mendoza et al, 2022;Piecha et al, 2022;Tahat, 2023;Valaskova & Nagy, 2023;Van de Walle & Bouckaert, 2007).…”