2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.07.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macondo oil in deep-sea sediments: Part 2 — Distribution and distinction from background and natural oil seeps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 and SI Appendix, Fig. S2), particularly the appearance of distinct patterns of biomarker ratios deeper in the sediment column where seep oil is expected to be the dominant source (25,26), suggests that the matching process successfully identified samples contaminated by Macondo oil against a lowlevel background of chemically distinct seep oils.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 and SI Appendix, Fig. S2), particularly the appearance of distinct patterns of biomarker ratios deeper in the sediment column where seep oil is expected to be the dominant source (25,26), suggests that the matching process successfully identified samples contaminated by Macondo oil against a lowlevel background of chemically distinct seep oils.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We tested the validity of these relationships for the seafloor by comparing the residual fraction for each hydrocarbon remaining in the sediment 4 y after the spill began. Among the compounds examined, carbon skeletons range from nine to 37 atoms (aliphatics, 9-37; aromatics, 9-22; biomarkers, [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and vary in complexity from the straight-chain aliphatic n-C9 to the pentacyclic, multiply substituted biomarker pentakishomohopane. This analysis provides an unparalleled window into the disposition of oil following the DWH event, in that the extent of biodegradation is quantified simultaneously for 125 petroleum hydrocarbons across wide-ranging contamination levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, 1-3 years after the spill, PAH concentrations in many of these surface sediments were similar to pre-DWH conditions [11]. This depletion can be attributed to the combined effects of dissolution and biodegradation [12,13]. In fact, microbially sourced radiocarbon-depleted organic molecular species were observed in the water column 4 years after the spill event, potentially accounting for a large proportion of "missing" spilled hydrocarbon [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The location in the Gulf of Mexico that we sampled most intensely, Blue Hammock Bayou, Louisiana, was impacted by crude oil and the plankton community was adversely affected by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill (Sammarco et al., 2013) (see section 1). Perhaps the presence of natural oil seeps in the Gulf of Mexico and episodic injections of crude oil into the sediment and water (Anderson, Scalan, Parker, & Behrens, 1983; Stout & Payne, 2016; Stout, Payne, Ricker, Baker, & Lewis, 2016) had imposed temporally varying selection on the copepod population. Such conditions could have led to balancing selection acting to maintain genetic variation in crude oil tolerance in the copepod population, enhancing the evolutionary potential of the population when faced with changes in oil conditions (Posavi, Larget, Gelembiuk, & Lee, 2014; Turelli & Barton, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%