2016
DOI: 10.1017/s0960129516000281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mackey-complete spaces and power series – a topological model of differential linear logic

Abstract: In this paper, we have described a denotational model of Intuitionist Linear Logic which is also a differential category. Formulas are interpreted as Mackey-complete topological vector space and linear proofs are interpreted by bounded linear functions. So as to interpret nonlinear proofs of Linear Logic, we have used a notion of power series between Mackey-complete spaces, generalizing the notion of entire functions in C. Finally, we have obtained a quantitative model of Intuitionist Differential Linear Logic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, extending the case study of Banach spaces to LNL-polycategories could help understand better LL and DiLL, for example by studying models coming from functional analysis such as those considered in Kerjean's work, see [50,24,48,49] .…”
Section: Conclusion Conclusion and Further Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, extending the case study of Banach spaces to LNL-polycategories could help understand better LL and DiLL, for example by studying models coming from functional analysis such as those considered in Kerjean's work, see [50,24,48,49] .…”
Section: Conclusion Conclusion and Further Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Families of denotational models for the differential λ-calculus have been studied in depth [12,13,16,29], and the relationship between these and change actions is the subject of ongoing work.…”
Section: Differential λ-Calculusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of completion explains the form of our interpretation of non-linear proofs, as simple sequences of monomials. Thus, even though the model interprets differential linear logic, we are far from capturing the intuition of smoothness of proofs behind the notion of differentiation (as done for example in [BET12,KT15]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the latter is tied to the induced (co-Kleisli) cartesian closed category of non-linear functions. To deal with these non-linear functions, completion is usually necessary [Ehr05,BET12,KT15]. The lack of completion explains the form of our interpretation of non-linear proofs, as simple sequences of monomials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation