2001
DOI: 10.1038/35055568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

macho-1 encodes a localized mRNA in ascidian eggs that specifies muscle fate during embryogenesis

Abstract: Maternal information stored in particular regions of the egg cytoplasm has an important function in the determination of developmental fate during early animal development. Ascidians show mosaic development; such autonomous development has been taken as evidence that prelocalized ooplasmic factors specify tissue precursor cells during embryogenesis. Interest has been concentrated on the mechanisms underlying the formation of muscle cells in the tail, as yellow-coloured myoplasm in eggs is preferentially segreg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
221
1
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(234 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
221
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted above, MEF2 and SRF were identified as likely coregulators, in agreement with previous reports (Groisman et al 1996;Molkentin and Olson 1996). Remarkably, our analyses also identified TEAD4, Six1, and Zic1 (a GLIrelated transcription factor that appears to determine muscle lineage in ascidians) (Nishida and Sawada 2001;Imai et al 2002) as additional, novel candidate coregulators (Table 3), reinforcing our factor binding studies and published observations (Fig. 4B).…”
Section: Myogenic Regulatory Factors and Combinatorial Controlsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As noted above, MEF2 and SRF were identified as likely coregulators, in agreement with previous reports (Groisman et al 1996;Molkentin and Olson 1996). Remarkably, our analyses also identified TEAD4, Six1, and Zic1 (a GLIrelated transcription factor that appears to determine muscle lineage in ascidians) (Nishida and Sawada 2001;Imai et al 2002) as additional, novel candidate coregulators (Table 3), reinforcing our factor binding studies and published observations (Fig. 4B).…”
Section: Myogenic Regulatory Factors and Combinatorial Controlsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Although the details of ZicL function in the specification and subsequent differentiation of nerve cord cells are obscure, ZicL function in B-line muscle cells appears to be coordinated with the function of another zinc finger transcription factor gene, Ci-macho1 (Satou et al, 2002). Halocynthia macho-1 appears to have the potential to promote the entire genetic cascade for muscle cell differentiation (Nishida and Sawada, 2001). On the other hand, the potential of Ci-macho1 to promote the genetic cascade for muscle cell differentiation appears partial, and requires the collaborative functioning of ZicL (Imai et al, 2002c).…”
Section: The Complexity Of Zicl Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notochord-specific expression of Hr-Bra depends on a module between -289 and -250 of the upstream sequence of the gene. The Halocynthia genome also contains two types of Zic-related genes, macho-1 (Nishida and Sawada, 2001) and zicN (Wada and Saiga, 2002). HrzicN is expressed in blastomeres of muscle, notochord, anterior mesenchyme and nerve cord, and the gene seems to be responsible for the differentiation of these types of cell, and a model in which HrzicN may activate Hr-Bra together with FGF/BMP signaling pathway is proposed (Wada and Saiga, 2002).…”
Section: Other Factors Controlling Ci-bra Transcriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determinants as well as numerous other maternal mRNAs (called PEM or postplasmic RNAs, Sasakura et al, 2000) are contained in the contraction pole and they will experience the largest variations in [Ca 2+ ] c setting up a periodic Ca 2+ gradient highest in the vegetal hemisphere. It is remarkable that the recently identified muscle determinant (macho1 mRNA, Nishida and Sawada, 2001) is in fact located on the ER which accumulates in the contraction pole . The close proximity of these determinants with the origin of the meiosis II Ca 2+ waves suggests that some Ca 2+ dependant processes may play a role in the maturation or priming of these determinants.…”
Section: What Roles For Cortical Ca 2+ Wave Pacemakers?mentioning
confidence: 99%