2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machinery fault diagnosis using supervised manifold learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The technique can be realized through several algorithms including locally linear embedding (LLE) [17], isometric feature mapping (IsoMap) [18], local tangent space alignment (LTSA) [19], and Laplacian eigenmaps (LE) [20], etc. Many studies have been conducted by applying manifold learning to the machinery fault diagnosis [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. In recent years, the application of manifold learning in mechanical fault diagnosis can be divided into two categories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The technique can be realized through several algorithms including locally linear embedding (LLE) [17], isometric feature mapping (IsoMap) [18], local tangent space alignment (LTSA) [19], and Laplacian eigenmaps (LE) [20], etc. Many studies have been conducted by applying manifold learning to the machinery fault diagnosis [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. In recent years, the application of manifold learning in mechanical fault diagnosis can be divided into two categories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the application of manifold learning in mechanical fault diagnosis can be divided into two categories. On one hand, manifold learning is used to extract non-linear features for fault classification [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], on the other hand, this technique is applied to extract the transient signals from the noise contaminated signal [29][30][31][32]. The above mentioned studies have demonstrated that manifold learning is effective to extract the intrinsic manifold features related to non-linear dynamics of the mechanical system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a novel theory of nonlinear dimension reduction called manifold learning is becoming the research focus. It can discover the intrinsic feature of nonlinear high-dimensional data by projecting 4 them into a low-dimensional feature space and preserving the local neighborhood structure [15][16][17][18]. Typical manifold learning methods mainly include Linear Discriminate Analysis (LDA) [19], Neighborhood Preserving Embedding (NPE) [20], Locality Preserving Projection (LPP) [21], Linear Local Tangent Space Alignment (LLTSA) [22], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, Zhang et al [29] presented an LLE-based sensor fault detection method, while Li and Zhang [30] proposed to use the supervised LLE projection for machinery fault diagnosis. Jiang and co-authors [31,32] applied the modified LE method for fault pattern classification, while Hu and Yuan [33] proposed the multiway LPP (MLPP) method for batch process monitoring and demonstrated that the MLPP outperforms the conventional multiway PCA. Shao et al [34] introduced a nonlinear fault diagnosis based on the generalized LPP method which imposes orthogonality constraints on the projection vectors, while Yu [35,36] used the LPP for bearing performance degradation assessment, combing with an exponential weighted moving average statistic and Gaussian mixture models, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%