2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-019-01483-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning technique for data-driven fault detection of nonlinear processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results showed outstanding performance for different operating conditions. Said et al [32] proposed a new method for machine learning flaw detection using the reduced kernel partial least squares method to handle non-linear dynamic systems. Their research resulted in a calculation time reduction and a decrease in the rate of false alarms.…”
Section: Similar Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results showed outstanding performance for different operating conditions. Said et al [32] proposed a new method for machine learning flaw detection using the reduced kernel partial least squares method to handle non-linear dynamic systems. Their research resulted in a calculation time reduction and a decrease in the rate of false alarms.…”
Section: Similar Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For complex chemical process, the moving window technique presents good effectiveness compared to other methods [12,30]. But, for example, the moving window RKPLS (MW-RKPLS) is based on the dataset size of the moving window.…”
Section: Related Work Of Dynamic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, the FD performances of the suggested method are illustrated in terms of good detection rate (GDR), false alarm rate (FAR), and computation time (CT). In this article, a comparative study of data-driven fault detection and monitoring methods was performed between the proposed method DRKPLS, moving window RKPLS (MW-RKPLS) [12], moving window reduced rank KPCA (MW-RRKPCA) [13], and online reduced rank KPLCA (ORRKPCA) [14]. To conclude, the main contributions of this paper are as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A manufacturing system includes several sub-functions [1,2], such as planning [3], scheduling [4][5][6][7], dispatching [8], machine maintenance [9,10], and quality control and inspection [11,12]. In particular, to facilitate the effective operation of a manufacturing process, automated predictive maintenance operations are preferentially performed via fault detection, diagnosis, and predictions based on sensor signals collected during process execution [9,10,[13][14][15]. For example, Lu et al [16] detected occurrences of bearing faults during operation under harsh conditions (i.e., low signal-to-noise ratio) by applying adaptive stochastic resonance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%