2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.5.104407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning prediction of thermodynamic and mechanical properties of multicomponent Fe-Cr-based alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Supplementary Fig. S18 a–c, the Pugh’s ratio increases with decreasing , in agreement with the ML results by Mukhamedov et al 67 Since Li has the lowest Pauling electronegativity as compared to Cu or Si, the Pugh’s ratio for the topmost AlBeMgTiLi composition is higher than that of AlBeMgTiCu. Similarly, the Pugh’s ratio increases generally with increasing as shown in Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen in Supplementary Fig. S18 a–c, the Pugh’s ratio increases with decreasing , in agreement with the ML results by Mukhamedov et al 67 Since Li has the lowest Pauling electronegativity as compared to Cu or Si, the Pugh’s ratio for the topmost AlBeMgTiLi composition is higher than that of AlBeMgTiCu. Similarly, the Pugh’s ratio increases generally with increasing as shown in Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The Pugh’s ratio for the topmost stable composition of AlBeMgTiLi is the highest and that of AlBeMgTiSi is the lowest. ML-based studies 67 , 68 indicate that and are the two most appropriate atomistic descriptors for prediction of the ratio. As can be seen in Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is adopted in many existing works for learning elastic properties ( e.g. , for alloys 24–27 and polycrystals 28,29 ) and related atomic properties like stress and energy fields. 30 They are, however, limited to derived scalar elastic properties such as bulk modulus and shear modulus, and separate models are built for each derived property.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a nutshell, state-of-the-art ML models for elastic properties encode compositional information [19][20][21] and/or structural information [20][21][22][23] in a material as feature vectors and then map them to a target using some regression algorithms. This approach is adopted in many existing works for learning elastic properties (e.g., for alloys [24][25][26][27] and polycrystals 28,29 ) and related atomic properties like stress and energy elds. 30 They are, however, limited to derived scalar elastic properties such as bulk modulus and shear modulus, and separate models are built for each derived property.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We based our approach on the use of machine learning (ML) techniques, with a focus on probabilistic models and artificial neural networks. Limited by the amount of available composition-property data, conventional ML approaches in alloy design have to predominantly rely on simulation data, often with only limited experimental validation ( 9 , 10 ). As the experimental microstructure database continues to expand, ML obtains higher accuracy in predicting the phase or microstructure of materials ( 11 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%