2021
DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00920-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning Prediction and Experimental Validation of Antigenic Drift in H3 Influenza A Viruses in Swine

Abstract: The antigenic diversity of influenza A viruses (IAV) circulating in swine challenges the development of effective vaccines, increasing zoonotic threat and pandemic potential. High-throughput sequencing technologies can quantify IAV genetic diversity, but there are no accurate approaches to adequately describe antigenic phenotypes. This study evaluated an ensemble of nonlinear regression models to estimate virus phenotype from genotype. Regression models were trained with a phenotypic data set of pairwise hemag… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect on antigenic distance could be associated with the physical or chemical properties of the amino acid affecting protein folding or the effect of such differences on N -glycosylation. As for other viruses, mutations/substitutions in certain amino acid sites (also referred to as immunodominant sites) may result in changes in epitope structure or complete hiding of an epitope, hence limiting or impairing host immune response and translating to a change in immunogenic phenotype ( 46 , 64 68 ). For PRRSV, although the ectodomains have been documented to present epitope binding sites, characterization of the role of amino acid substitutions in specific sites in immune response, especially for PRRSV1, has not been exhaustive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effect on antigenic distance could be associated with the physical or chemical properties of the amino acid affecting protein folding or the effect of such differences on N -glycosylation. As for other viruses, mutations/substitutions in certain amino acid sites (also referred to as immunodominant sites) may result in changes in epitope structure or complete hiding of an epitope, hence limiting or impairing host immune response and translating to a change in immunogenic phenotype ( 46 , 64 68 ). For PRRSV, although the ectodomains have been documented to present epitope binding sites, characterization of the role of amino acid substitutions in specific sites in immune response, especially for PRRSV1, has not been exhaustive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, genetic differences within the HA gene are generally considered responsible for the differences in antigenic phenotypes between viral strains (simply described as antigenic distances between viruses) ( 45 ). Outputs from such HI/cross-reactivity assays have been used to develop in silico predictive models combining sequence data and machine learning algorithms to predict antigenic differences among viruses ( 46 , 47 ). Genomic differences between PRRSV and influenzas notwithstanding, similar cross-reactivity data from SN assays can be combined with machine learning algorithms and sequence data for already characterized genes of PRRSV to estimate the antigenic distance between viruses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clade classification for each segment was done using the automated classification tool OctoFLU (Chang et al, 2019) (Zeller et al, 2021).…”
Section: Sequence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past two decades, 2020 was the most prolific publication year on this topic, with 33 articles from a total of 96 articles. Most of the articles discussed machine learning and deep learning approach to predict and forecast virus spread [95], the likelihood of vaccinated patients [96], and the vaccine effectiveness [97]. The rest articles discussed the classification of tropism protein signature for influenza virus identification [98], classification of symptoms for diagnosis of suspected people [99], and early warning detection of infected patients [100].…”
Section: Miscellaneous Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%