Machine learning outperforms traditional logistic regression and offers new possibilities for cardiovascular risk prediction: A study involving 143,043 Chinese patients with hypertension

Abstract

IntroductionIdentifying people at risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is a cornerstone of preventive cardiology. We developed machine learning (ML) algorithms and investigated their performance in predicting patients’ current CVD risk (coronary heart disease and stroke in this study).Materials and methodsWe compared traditional logistic regression (LR) with five ML algorithms LR with Elastic-Net, Random Forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), Support Vector Machine, Deep Learning, and an Ensemble model averaging predictions from RF, XGB, and Deep Learning for CVD risk prediction using pre-existing patient-level data from a multi-center, cross-sectional study (the Microalbuminuria Screening in Hypertensive Patients Project initiated by the China International Exchange and Promotive Association for Medical and Healthcare) that enrolled 143,043 patients with hypertension from 600 tertiary, secondary, or community hospitals. Each of the five ML algorithms incorporated 18 variables, such as demographics, examinations, comorbidities, and treatment regimens, and were trained and evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation. Predictive accuracy was assessed by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC).ResultsPatients’ mean age was 62 ± 12 years and 57% were men. Advanced ML algorithms outperformed the traditional LR model. Particularly, the Ensemble model had superior discrimination with an AUROC of 0.760 than LR (AUC = 0.737) and other tested models.ConclusionWe establishes an Ensemble model that shows better performance in predicting patients’ current CVD risk using routine information compared to the traditional LR model. ML can help physicians design follow-up plans with more accurate results, offering new possibilities for short-term risk prediction and early detection. Further, ML models can be trained with longitudinal data and used to predict long-term CVD risks, thereby informing CVD prevention.

Machine Learning for Evaluating Hospital Mobility: An Italian Case Study

“…The predictive model will employ the Logistic Regression algorithm to estimate the mobility gradient of hospitals in 2021, categorizing them into three classes: LOW, MEDIUM, and HIGH mobility, based on the distance patients travel to reach the hospital. This choice is supported by studies demonstrating the effectiveness of Logistic Regression in predicting mobility behaviors and health risks, such as the analysis of travel behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic [19] and the assessment of cardiovascular risk [32], highlighting its applicability in complex healthcare contexts.…”

A Random Forest Algorithm for Assessing Risk Factors Associated With Chronic Kidney Disease: Observational Study

“…A longitudinal study involving 143,043 patients with hypertension was performed to predict long-term CVD risk. The study reported that advanced machine learning algorithms using RF performed better than traditional LR [ 19 ]. A longitudinal cohort study compared clinical risk predictions among patients with CVD using 19 prediction techniques.…”

Combinatorial Use of Machine Learning and Logistic Regression for Predicting Carotid Plaque Risk Among 5.4 Million Adults With Fatty Liver Disease Receiving Health Check-Ups: Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study

“…Wu et al [13] developed a carotid plaque risk prediction tool among asymptomatic population based on machine learning (ML) algorithms, including extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), gradient boosting decision tree, random forest (RF), and support vector machine, and achieved good performance, but the substantial complexity of the model may limit its practical use, while the commonly used risk prediction tools in the cardiovascular field, including Framingham risk score [15] and its modified model [16], were mostly based on traditional statistical models, including logistic regression and cox proportional-hazards regression. Although numerous studies have demonstrated that ML algorithms outperformed traditional statistical models in predictive performance throughout medical fields [17][18][19] due to their capability to analyze and learn the complex interactions and nonlinear associations among variables [17,20,21], the latter still own irreplaceable strengths, including their natural transparency, interpretability, and robustness, which boost their practicality in clinical research [22]. Therefore, using ML algorithms alone or traditional regression methods alone to train prediction models usually results in either accurate but complicated black boxes or practical but unsatisfactory-performed scoring systems.…”