2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.101.042003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine-learning nonstationary noise out of gravitational-wave detectors

Abstract: Signal extraction out of background noise is a common challenge in high-precision physics experiments, where the measurement output is often a continuous data stream. To improve the signalto-noise ratio of the detection, witness sensors are often used to independently measure background noises and subtract them from the main signal. If the noise coupling is linear and stationary, optimal techniques already exist and are routinely implemented in many experiments. However, when the noise coupling is non-stationa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
116
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
116
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In O3, this procedure was completed as a part of the calibration pipeline [38], both in low latency and offline. Additional noise contributions due to nonlinear coupling of the 60 Hz power mains are subtracted for offline analyses using coupling functions that rely on machine learning techniques [42].…”
Section: Detectors and Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In O3, this procedure was completed as a part of the calibration pipeline [38], both in low latency and offline. Additional noise contributions due to nonlinear coupling of the 60 Hz power mains are subtracted for offline analyses using coupling functions that rely on machine learning techniques [42].…”
Section: Detectors and Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent to the subtraction conducted within the online calibration pipeline, we perform a secondary offline subtraction [55] on the LIGO data with the goal of ; the point estimate waveform from the CWB search [43] (black lines); the 90% credible intervals from the posterior probability density functions of the waveform time series, obtained via Bayesian inference (LALINFERENCE [49]) with the NRSur7dq4 binary BH waveform model [50] (orange bands), and with a generic wavelet model (BayesWave [51], purple bands). The ordinate axes are in units of noise standard deviations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen in Figure 7, the contribution of these auxiliary channels to the DARM noise is larger than expected based on coherence alone, suggesting nonlinear, bilinear, and/or nonstationary coupling to DARM. Nonstationary coupling has already been observed due to modulation from motion of the angular degrees of freedom, and can be partially removed offline [79,80]. Additional work is required to understand this type of contribution to the interferometer noise floor.…”
Section: G Auxiliary Length Control Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…IV G 1), is expected to improve the nonlinear noise coupling during times of large ground motion and also improve interferometer duty cycle by limiting saturations. Machine learning techniques are being developed that allow offline removal of nonlinear noise contributions [79].…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%