2022
DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2021.01536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Occurrence of Respiratory Diseases Using Climatic and Air-Pollution Factors

Abstract: Objectives. Because climatic and air-pollution factors are known to influence the occurrence of respiratory diseases, we used these factors to develop machine learning models for predicting the occurrence of respiratory diseases.Methods. We obtained the daily number of respiratory disease patients in Seoul. We used climatic and air-pollution factors to predict the daily number of patients treated for respiratory diseases per 10,000 inhabitants. We applied the reliefbased feature selection algorithm to evaluate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our algorithm achieved an R2 value of 99%, outperforming the approach proposed by Khatri K L, Tamil L S (2) and Khaiwal R, Bahadur S S, Katoch V, Bhardwaj S, Kaur-Sidhu M, Gupta M, et al (4) by a margin of 17% and 12% respectively. Also, our algorithm demonstrated higher R2 and RMSE values, with R2 reaching 99% and RMSE 0.46 and 0.22, compared to the R2 of 67% and RMSE of 13.9 reported by Ku Y, Kwon SB, Yoon JH, Mun SK, and Chang M (3) . In addition to the above findings, our algorithm demonstrates remarkably low forecasting errors for ARI and Pneumonia, with rates of 2.25% and 5.12% respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our algorithm achieved an R2 value of 99%, outperforming the approach proposed by Khatri K L, Tamil L S (2) and Khaiwal R, Bahadur S S, Katoch V, Bhardwaj S, Kaur-Sidhu M, Gupta M, et al (4) by a margin of 17% and 12% respectively. Also, our algorithm demonstrated higher R2 and RMSE values, with R2 reaching 99% and RMSE 0.46 and 0.22, compared to the R2 of 67% and RMSE of 13.9 reported by Ku Y, Kwon SB, Yoon JH, Mun SK, and Chang M (3) . In addition to the above findings, our algorithm demonstrates remarkably low forecasting errors for ARI and Pneumonia, with rates of 2.25% and 5.12% respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…Moreover, the research did not take into account separating the meteorological and air pollution data individually. Ku Y, Kwon SB, Yoon JH, Mun SK, and Chang M (3) compare Gaussian process regressor and gradient boosting methods for patient arrival forecasting for the period of 2014-2019. Both models demonstrated competitive prediction performance, with R2 values of over 0.67 and RMSE values below 13.9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More associations will be identified with the accumulation of NHIRD and EPA monitoring data. ML models for predicting the incidence of disease using environmental and air pollution factors could evolve into medical and public health warning systems 67 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We could not include the treatment histories of medication and surgical procedures for CP and DNI, which may have led to heterogeneity in the analyses. Although we included several variables, including demographic and socioeconomic factors and comorbidities, there are several potential confounders, such as a history of tonsillectomy or other neck surgeries and a history of airway infection, that can influence the relationship between CP and DNI [29,30]. Further studies may be warranted to determine the specific associations between CP and DNI according to severity and subtype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%