Machine Learning Models for Image-Based Diagnosis and Prognosis of COVID-19: Systematic Review

Abstract

Background Accurate and timely diagnosis and effective prognosis of the disease is important to provide the best possible care for patients with COVID-19 and reduce the burden on the health care system. Machine learning methods can play a vital role in the diagnosis of COVID-19 by processing chest x-ray images. Objective The aim of this study is to summarize information on the use of intelligent models for the diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 to help with early and timely diagnosis, minimize prolonged diagnosis, and improve overall health care. Methods A systematic search of databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, IEEE, ProQuest, Scopus, bioRxiv, and medRxiv, was performed for COVID-19–related studies published up to May 24, 2020. This study was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. All original research articles describing the application of image processing for the prediction and diagnosis of COVID-19 were considered in the analysis. Two reviewers independently assessed the published papers to determine eligibility for inclusion in the analysis. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Results Of the 629 articles retrieved, 44 articles were included. We identified 4 prognosis models for calculating prediction of disease severity and estimation of confinement time for individual patients, and 40 diagnostic models for detecting COVID-19 from normal or other pneumonias. Most included studies used deep learning methods based on convolutional neural networks, which have been widely used as a classification algorithm. The most frequently reported predictors of prognosis in patients with COVID-19 included age, computed tomography data, gender, comorbidities, symptoms, and laboratory findings. Deep convolutional neural networks obtained better results compared with non–neural network–based methods. Moreover, all of the models were found to be at high risk of bias due to the lack of information about the study population, intended groups, and inappropriate reporting. Conclusions Machine learning models used for the diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 showed excellent discriminative performance. However, these models were at high risk of bias, because of various reasons such as inadequate information about study participants, randomization process, and the lack of external validation, which may have resulted in the optimistic reporting of these models. Hence, our findings do not recommend any of the current models to be used in practice for the diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19.

Street images classification according to COVID-19 risk in Lima, Peru: A convolutional neural networks analysis

“…Future work should strengthen available convolutional neural networks or develop a new architecture which could maximize the accuracy classification, not only for a binary outcomes but also covering multiple outcomes. This work could spark interest to use convolutional neural networks –and other artificial intelligence tools– to advance population health and the epidemiological knowledge of COVID-19 (and other diseases), above and beyond the applications of convolutional neural networks for diagnosis and prognosis of individual patients (e.g., classification of chest X-rays and compute tomography images 1-3 ).…”

“…Overall, deep learning techniques, including convolutional neural networks, could be adopted by epidemiological research to advance the evidence about risk factors as well as disease outcomes and distribution, in addition to their current use in clinical medicine. 1-3…”

“…In COVID-19 research, deep learning tools applied to image analysis (i.e., computer vision) have informed the diagnosis and prognosis of patients through classification of chest X-ray and computer tomography images. [1][2][3] These tools have greatly helped practitioners treating COVID-19 patients.…”

Clinical prediction system of complications among patients with COVID-19: A development and validation retrospective multicentre study during first wave of the pandemic

“…In recent years, machine learning gained popularity for the development of algorithms for clinical decision support tools [ [20] , [21] , [22] ]. In the context of COVID-19, most machine learning studies have focused either on diagnosis or prognosis based on adverse events, mostly mortality and intubation [ 2 , 23 , 24 ]. We summarize a few examples in Table 1 .…”

Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome for COVID-19 Lung Patients: A Biomedical Imaging Perspective

“…In 2020, there have been six AI-based systematic reviews (aiSR) on ARDS [11][12][13][14][15][16]. However, they are incomplete, not well focused, and lack practical recommendations for safe and effective AI design for ARDS analysis.…”