Machine learning models applied to friction stir welding defect index using multiple joint configurations and alloys

Abstract

Friction stir welding process has been studied extensively in the last decades since its early stage. Most of the research done so far is related to the process development including tool design, material weldability, post-weld mechanical behavior, and microstructural properties. More recently, in-line process monitoring and artificial intelligence algorithms are introduced into this process, but mainly to specific material configuration and joint thicknesses. This study will focus on the evaluation of different machine learning approaches including principle component analysis, K-nearest neighbor, multilayer perceptron, single vector machine, and random forest methods on a friction stir welding cell environment. The input variables provided from this cell environment are namely divided into two groups: one group refers to the application variables and the other group is related to the friction stir welding process variables. The application variables target the aluminum alloys, joint configuration, sheet thicknesses, initial mechanical properties, and their chemical composition. The friction stir welding process variables dictate the rotational speed, travel speed, forging force, longitudinal and transverse forces, torque, and specific energy. The output response to model from these machine learning algorithms is the defect index, which has been quantified using high-resolution immersed bath ultrasounds. This nondestructive evaluation technique has been described previously, which can detect defects ≥150 µm in thin sheets. The defect index has been classified into five classes, which is distinguished by the nature of defect, cold weld, or hot weld, as well as the width of the internal volumetric defect upon ultrasound C-scan result. The dataset, which is composed of around 500 various process conditions, has been generated over the last few years and the variables were taken exclusively in constant weld regime and in the force control mode using the output average values. This paper compares the best resulting machine learning methods applied on a friction stir welding cell basis, which is the K-nearest neighbor and multilayer perceptron algorithms. The K-nearest neighbor model reaches a deviation of 0.55 on the defect index in comparison with the experimental values, which is slightly better than the multilayer perceptron model, which obtains a score of 0.69. Over the initial 59 available model parameters, 10 and 15 of them were retained in the final algorithm using these techniques. The main predictors include the material thickness, base material ultimate tensile stress, rotational speed, travel speed, weld forces, and specific energy. The K-nearest neighbor model was able to provide a map of defect indices with regard to rotational speed and travel speed but was only possible when a higher density of data was found within the prediction area. A data density score was also included within the model to inform the end-user about the prediction reliability. The machine learning models are mainly about differentiating various cases rather than representing the physical phenomena as determined using the finite element analysis. That being said, in order to improve the prediction reliability as well as the machine learning models, the data twinning concept, which consists of generating simulated friction stir welding process conditions by finite element analysis, is briefly discussed.

Sustainability of Fusion and Solid-State Welding Process in the Era of Industry 4.0

“…However, there is a need to explore these and other hybrid algorithms in welding applications for optimization of process parameter and predicting the performance measures. Nadeau et al (2020) applied different machine learning algorithms for predicting the defective welds over various process variables. Out of these machine learning models, K-nearest neighbor (KNN) technique performs best for predicting defective welds.…”

A Survey of Machine Learning in Friction Stir Welding, including Unresolved Issues and Future Research Directions

“…Rotational speed, forging speed, travel speed, transverse and longitudinal forces, and specific energy and torque are the process parameters given as input in the machine learning model. The defect index is produced as an output [2]. Process parameters for FSW can be easily determined with less error than 5% using machine learning.…”

Optimization of the Mechanical Property of Friction Stir Welded Heat Treatable Aluminum Alloy by using Bio-Inspired Artificial Intelligence Algorithms

“…The machine learning algorithms created using the input of 15 force variables were 98.0% accurate at classifying defects as tunnels and porosities and 95.8% accurate at detecting flaws. Nadeau et al [25] examined the effectiveness of various machine learning techniques on a friction stir welding cell environment, including principal component analysis, K-nearest neighbor, multilayer perceptron, single vector machine, and random forest techniques. The input variables from this cell environment are specifically separated into two groups: the application variables and the friction stir welding process variables.…”