2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning methods as a tool to analyse incomplete or irregularly sampled radon time series data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In radon science, ML has first been used, to our knowledge, by [53,67] and [52] for spatial settings and by [111] in time series analysis. Current work at the BfS aims to improve regional GRP and IRC prediction by including high numbers (up to 100) of potential predictors [32].…”
Section: Machine Learning (Ml)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In radon science, ML has first been used, to our knowledge, by [53,67] and [52] for spatial settings and by [111] in time series analysis. Current work at the BfS aims to improve regional GRP and IRC prediction by including high numbers (up to 100) of potential predictors [32].…”
Section: Machine Learning (Ml)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performances of the different methods were assessed by 5 × 10-fold cross-validation and by moving-window crossvalidation (Kasemsumran et al, 2006). For the 5 × 10fold cross-validation method, data were randomly split into 10 subgroups and predictions were carried out 10 times; each time one group is used for validation and nine are used for modelling the variable of interest (i.e.…”
Section: Cross-validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loss function has to be defined by the user, and a common choice is the Root-Mean-Square Error (RSME) (Janik et al, 2018). In our case the optimal idp was found to be 1.5 ( Figure 3), and interpolations of the AM were carried out using the observations within a distance of 1,000 km, and a minimum and maximum number of nearest observations was set to 5 and 75 respectively.…”
Section: Inverse Distance Weighted Interpolation (Idw)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAE and RMSE are commonly used for assessing model performance; however, they may be influenced by outliers (Chen et al, 2017). RMSLE, on the contrary, is less sensitive to outliers and preferable when there is a large range in the values (Janik et al, 2018). These parameters are positive values and the closer they are to 0, the better is the model fit.…”
Section: Cross-validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation