Machine learning in renal pathology

Abstract

IntroductionWhen assessing kidney biopsies, pathologists use light microscopy, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy to describe and diagnose glomerular lesions and diseases. These methods can be laborious, costly, fraught with inter-observer variability, and can have delays in turn-around time. Thus, computational approaches can be designed as screening and/or diagnostic tools, potentially relieving pathologist time, healthcare resources, while also having the ability to identify novel biomarkers, including subvisual features.MethodsHere, we implement our recently published biomarker feature extraction (BFE) model along with 3 pre-trained deep learning models (VGG16, VGG19, and InceptionV3) to diagnose 3 glomerular diseases using PAS-stained digital pathology images alone. The BFE model extracts a panel of 233 explainable features related to underlying pathology, which are subsequently narrowed down to 10 morphological and microstructural texture features for classification with a linear discriminant analysis machine learning classifier. 45 patient renal biopsies (371 glomeruli) from minimal change disease (MCD), membranous nephropathy (MN), and thin-basement membrane nephropathy (TBMN) were split into training/validation and held out sets. For the 3 deep learningmodels, data augmentation and Grad-CAM were used for better performance and interpretability.ResultsThe BFE model showed glomerular validation accuracy of 67.6% and testing accuracy of 76.8%. All deep learning approaches had higher validation accuracies (most for VGG16 at 78.5%) but lower testing accuracies. The highest testing accuracy at the glomerular level was VGG16 at 71.9%, while at the patient-level was InceptionV3 at 73.3%.DiscussionThe results highlight the potential of both traditional machine learning and deep learning-based approaches for kidney biopsy evaluation.

Identifying and matching 12‐level multistained glomeruli via deep learning for diagnosis of glomerular diseases

“…5,6 Multiple levels and stainings are necessary but limit the overall efficiency of the diagnosis of glomerular diseases. 7,8 Increasing the number of tissue sections and fusing glomerular lesions from all levels is time-consuming, and renal pathologists have to spend a lot of time identifying and matching glomeruli at multiple levels. And, this carries the potential risk of increasing the rate of missed diagnoses.…”