2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine-learning in grading of gliomas based on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging at 3T

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The prediction rate in our study performed better (65% of specificity, 79% sensitivity) than the one reported by Kickingereder et al [8] in a single-centre trial despite the overall heterogeneous nature of our large cohort in terms of molecular subgroups and DSC acquisition protocols. Similar machine-assisted techniques for tumour grade prediction demonstrated accuracy between 73 and 85% [40][41][42][43]. While our algorithm performance appears slightly inferior to the aforementioned results, we note that in all these studies patients are recruited from one centre, while we considered patients data from six centres.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prediction rate in our study performed better (65% of specificity, 79% sensitivity) than the one reported by Kickingereder et al [8] in a single-centre trial despite the overall heterogeneous nature of our large cohort in terms of molecular subgroups and DSC acquisition protocols. Similar machine-assisted techniques for tumour grade prediction demonstrated accuracy between 73 and 85% [40][41][42][43]. While our algorithm performance appears slightly inferior to the aforementioned results, we note that in all these studies patients are recruited from one centre, while we considered patients data from six centres.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Using a different simulation approach might however improve accuracy. Citak-Er et al [43] have proposed the use of a linear kernel support vector machine (SVM) with ten-fold cross-validation based on features extracted from conventional and advanced MRI data (DTI, DWI, DSC perfusion and MR-Spectroscopy), and reported 73.3% of overall sensitivity from their multiparametric MR imaging. For the purpose of our study we chose random-forest algorithm as an established method for three classes or more classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a different simulation approach might however improve accuracy. Citak-Er et al 43 certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They obtained a 93.94% accuracy rate with their proposed model. Citak et al [8] mentioned and they had been utilized three various computer aided techniques to classify the tumor. The algorithms used are Support Vector Machine, logistic regression, and multilayer perceptron.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%