2021
DOI: 10.7150/thno.51887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning identifies stroke features between species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eventually, our SA is translationally utilizing machine learning -enabled methodology from 3D human MRI-or CT-imaging data [16][17][18][19][20][21] on 2D tissue imaging data, reaching -at least-similar detection efficiency. 16,17 Recently published relevant MRI-data for rodents achieve results directly comparable to those of our SA for goodstained sections (Dice of 0.86 and FPR of 0.04) 59 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eventually, our SA is translationally utilizing machine learning -enabled methodology from 3D human MRI-or CT-imaging data [16][17][18][19][20][21] on 2D tissue imaging data, reaching -at least-similar detection efficiency. 16,17 Recently published relevant MRI-data for rodents achieve results directly comparable to those of our SA for goodstained sections (Dice of 0.86 and FPR of 0.04) 59 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In practice, the aforementioned methods have not achieved a wide appreciation and applicability by stroke laboratories, probably due to falsely detection of normal white-matter as lesion, significant inaccuracies upon poor processing and staining, and inability to correct falsely detected areas by the user. Although MRI-imaging 58,59 could theoretically compensate for stroke volumetry on sections, this is practically not widely applicable due to refractory high costs. Eventually, StrokeAnalyst addresses all these problems on tissue-based infarct-analysis by outlier detection and machine learning on a process that partially reflects the way human brain also works during manual lesion-analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a prognosis model that predicts mid-term/short-term outcomes established by machine learning algorithm in stroke field began to gain attention (Heo et al, 2019;Brugnara et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2021). Furthermore, machine learning algorithm is able to deal with a huge number of complex variables and provides specific numerical values of different predictors (Deng et al, 2018;He et al, 2020;Castaneda-Vega et al, 2021). Among some widely used algorithms, light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) is a classification model based on decision tree algorithm, with many advantages such as fast training speed, low memory consumption, high accuracy, and the ability to rapidly process massive data (Zhan et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2019;Shaker et al, 2021;Song et al, 2021;Liao et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These characteristics make the random forest classifier an appropriate choice for gene expression datasets [ 22 ]. Furthermore, with the development of the next-generation sequencing (NGS), random forest has already been used extensively in the biomedical field, such as neurology [ 23 ], cancer classification and even protein–protein interaction sites prediction [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%