Machine learning for the prediction of preclinical airway management in injured patients: a registry-based trial

Abstract

Objective:The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of using machine learning to establish the need for preclinical airway management for injured patients based on a standardized emergency dataset.Methods: A registry-based, retrospective analysis was conducted of adult trauma patients who were treated by physician-staffed emergency medical services in southwestern Germany between 2018 and 2020. The principal outcome was to assess the feasibility of using the random forest (RF) and Naive Bayes (NB) machine learning algorithms to predict the need for preclinical airway management. The secondary outcome was to use a principal component analysis to determine the attributes that can be used and advanced for future model development. Results:In total, 25,556 adults with multiple injuries were identified, including 1,451 patients (5.7%) who required airway management. Key attributes were auscultation, injury pattern, oxygen therapy, thoracic drainage, noninvasive ventilation, catecholamines, pelvic sling, colloid infusion, initial vital signs, preemergency status, and shock index. The area under the receiver operator curve was between 0.96 (RF; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-0.97) and 0.93 (NB; 95% CI, 0.92-0.93; P<0.01). For the prediction of airway management, RF yielded a higher precision-recall area than NB (0.83 [95% CI, 0.8-0.85] vs. 0.66 [95% CI, 0.61-0.72], respectively; P<0.01). Conclusion:To predict the need for preclinical airway management in injured patients, attributes that are commonly recorded in standardized datasets can be used with machine learning. In future models, the RF algorithm could be used because it has robust prediction accuracy.

Iatrogenic Tracheal Rupture Related to Prehospital Emergency Intubation in Adults: A 15-Year Single Center Experience

“…The curriculum of emergency response physicians lasts two years, whereas the clinical experience of tracheal intubation may vary considerably, which may be particularly relevant for nonanesthetists. [27][28][29][30] National guidelines include recommendations of prehospital airway management and prehospital anesthesia. 31,32 Patients with clinical suspicion of iatrogenic tracheal rupture after prehospital emergency intubation underwent chest CT and flexible bronchoscopy.…”