2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning for stuttering identification: Review, challenges and future directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the earlier work employed only a small set of disfluent speakers in their experimental studies, and has approached the SD problem as a binary classification problem: disfluent vs fluent identification or one vs other type [31]. The StutterNet we propose in our earlier work, is a time delay neural network based architecture that has been used to tackle the SD as a multi-class classification problem.…”
Section: A Stutternetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the earlier work employed only a small set of disfluent speakers in their experimental studies, and has approached the SD problem as a binary classification problem: disfluent vs fluent identification or one vs other type [31]. The StutterNet we propose in our earlier work, is a time delay neural network based architecture that has been used to tackle the SD as a multi-class classification problem.…”
Section: A Stutternetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the model performance, we use the following metrics: macro F1-score and accuracy which are the standard and are widely used in the stuttered speech domain [27], [28], [31], [36], [67]. The macro F1-score (F 1 ) (which combines the advantages of both precision and recall in a single metric unlike unweighted average recall which only takes recall into account) from equation ( 3) is often used in class imbalance scenarios with the intention to give equal importance to frequent and infrequent classes, and also is more robust towards the error type distribution [68].…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies show that persons who stutter (PWS) encounter several hardships in social and professional interactions (Kehoe and Contributors 2006). In addition, more people are progressively interacting with voice assistants, but they ignore and fail to recognize stuttered speech (Sheikh et al 2021a), and the stuttering detection (SD) can be exploited to improve automatic speech recognition (ASR) for PWS to access voice assistants such as Alexa, Siri, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, SD is addressed by various listening and brain scan tests (Ingham et al 1996;Smith and Weber 2017;Sheikh et al 2021a). However, this method of SD is high-priced and requires a demanding effort from speech therapists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%