2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.fraope.2023.100041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning for securing Cyber–Physical Systems under cyber attacks: A survey

Cheng Fei,
Jun Shen
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in [7], the global stability of complex valued FOCNNs with nodes in unequal dimensions and time delays was analyzed using comparison theory; in [8], the stability analysis of FOCNNs with time delays was investigated; in addition, the stability of two three-dimensional FOCNNs with different ring structures and time delays were analyzed; in [9], the authors studied the quantized output feedback synchronization of FOCNNs with output coupling; in [10], the authors considered the finite-time synchronization of FOCNNs with time-varying delays; the results were proved to be applicable to the FOCNNs without time delays and integer-order neural networks; in [11], the authors innovatively introduced the concept of finite-time passivity for FOCNNs with multiple state coupling or multiple derivative coupling; in [12], based on the existing passivity definition, the authors proposed the concepts of finite-time input strict passivity, finite-time output strict passivity, and finitetime strict passivity for FOCNNs; in addition, novel delay-dependent and order-dependent sufficient conditions ensuring the passivity performances were obtained for FOCNNs. More interesting results can be found in [13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, in [7], the global stability of complex valued FOCNNs with nodes in unequal dimensions and time delays was analyzed using comparison theory; in [8], the stability analysis of FOCNNs with time delays was investigated; in addition, the stability of two three-dimensional FOCNNs with different ring structures and time delays were analyzed; in [9], the authors studied the quantized output feedback synchronization of FOCNNs with output coupling; in [10], the authors considered the finite-time synchronization of FOCNNs with time-varying delays; the results were proved to be applicable to the FOCNNs without time delays and integer-order neural networks; in [11], the authors innovatively introduced the concept of finite-time passivity for FOCNNs with multiple state coupling or multiple derivative coupling; in [12], based on the existing passivity definition, the authors proposed the concepts of finite-time input strict passivity, finite-time output strict passivity, and finitetime strict passivity for FOCNNs; in addition, novel delay-dependent and order-dependent sufficient conditions ensuring the passivity performances were obtained for FOCNNs. More interesting results can be found in [13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Lemma 5. Suppose that β(t; ψ 1 ) and β(t; ψ 2 ) are the trajectories of system (17) with the initial condition ψ 1 and ψ 2 . Then, ψ 1 (ι)…”
Section: Proof Of Lemma 4 (I) Define η(T) λ − β(T) Then It Holds Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation