2018
DOI: 10.1364/ol.43.001235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning for improved image-based wavefront sensing

Abstract: For large amounts of wavefront error, gradient-based optimization methods for image-based wavefront sensing are unlikely to converge when the starting guess for the wavefront differs greatly from the true wavefront. We use machine learning operating on a point-spread function to determine a good initial estimate of the wavefront. We show that our trained convolutional neural network provides good initial estimates in the presence of simulated detector noise and is more effective than using many random starting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently machine learning based on convolutional neural network was proposed to get a good initial estimate of the wavefront and then achieve better convergence for a large amount of wavefront error. [ 163 ]…”
Section: Non‐interferometric Areal Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently machine learning based on convolutional neural network was proposed to get a good initial estimate of the wavefront and then achieve better convergence for a large amount of wavefront error. [ 163 ]…”
Section: Non‐interferometric Areal Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Architectures such as the Inception [23] and Xception [24] networks, on the other hand, excel at image classification tasks because they are able to recognize features at very different length scales. Though these architectures have been described for wavefront sensing [19,20], we suspected that these architectures could be improved for PR. Specifically, a single feature in a PSF image is by itself not necessarily indicative of the phase.…”
Section: Psf Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these approaches use a blur kernel that includes focus and astigmatism only or use larger kernels that are not physically realisable in a microscope [11,12] and typically do not take advantage of additional information from phase-diverse images. Other approaches model the image estimation part with a CNN and use a deconvolution module [11,13] to extract the PSF, or use existing CNN architectures such as ResNet and Inception to regress Zernike coefficients [12,14,15], and use iterative Richardson-Lucy to estimate the image but not both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a related note, Paine et.al. trained an Inception model and its variant for estimating a good initial guess of the wavefront [14]. and Nishizaki et.al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%