2020
DOI: 10.1201/9781003034858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning for Factor Investing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, create the "Close1" variable, which is tomorrow's closing price. We will then create the "Profit" variable, which is actually the daily profit [13]. The SMA equation is classified in…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, create the "Close1" variable, which is tomorrow's closing price. We will then create the "Profit" variable, which is actually the daily profit [13]. The SMA equation is classified in…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The p value of time period WB-WC was 0.04 and the response variable showed a decrease of − 25% with a 95% interval of [− 52%, + 5%]. These fluctuations of the sign during the post-periods of the two time periods meant that the effect is not significant and cannot be meaningfully interpreted (Coqueret & Guida, 2020 ).
Fig.
…”
Section: Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, those constraints ensure the ensemble not to perform worse than the worst component model in out-of-sample data (proof in Appendix B.2). Additionally, the non-negativity constraint can mitigate the potential issue of model correlation by shrinking the weights of some of the highly correlated models towards zero (Coqueret and Guida, 2020;Breiman, 1996). 5.…”
Section: Standard Linear Pool Ensembles (Slp)mentioning
confidence: 99%