Day 2 Wed, March 27, 2019 2019
DOI: 10.2523/iptc-19394-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning for Detecting Stuck Pipe Incidents: Data Analytics and Models Evaluation

Abstract: The earlier a stuck pipe incident is predicted and mitigated, the higher the chance of success in freeing the pipe or avoiding severe sticking in the first place. Time is crucial in such cases as an improper reaction to a stuck pipe incident can easily make it worse. In this work, practical machine learning, classification models were developed using real-time drilling data to automatically detect stuck pipe incidents during drilling operations and communicate the observations and alerts, sufficiently ahead of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, wellbore collapse may occur due to reduced pressure in the annulus resulting from lost circulation, leading to drill pipe and downhole tools being buried in the hole [6]. Loss of annular pressure may result in stuck pipe incidents [7,8], which would substantially increase the complexity of mitigation operations and hence NPT. Globally, the cost of lost circulation NPT is estimated to be US$ 2-4 billion yearly [1].…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, wellbore collapse may occur due to reduced pressure in the annulus resulting from lost circulation, leading to drill pipe and downhole tools being buried in the hole [6]. Loss of annular pressure may result in stuck pipe incidents [7,8], which would substantially increase the complexity of mitigation operations and hence NPT. Globally, the cost of lost circulation NPT is estimated to be US$ 2-4 billion yearly [1].…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three main causes of drilling non-productive-time (NPT) are 1) stuck pipe incidents, 2) mud circulation losses, and 3) well influx. Stuck pipe incidents occur when downhole force(s) prevent the movement of the drillstring [23][24][25]52]. Mud circulation losses occur when the drilling mud flows from the wellbore into the formations (due to natural or induced factors) [26,27,53,54].…”
Section: A Drillingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the down-sampling of the data collected at the rigs represents a substantial loss of information available for the models, as the trends may be wholly lost due to the low transmission frequency of ~0.2-1 Hz. For instance, erratic torque is an important sign for detecting stuck drillstring events, however, with a frequency of 0.2Hz, it may be difficult to detect it even by sophisticated non-linear ML models [23,24,62].…”
Section: Internet Of Things In the Drilling Ecosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jahanbakhshi et al (2012) developed a support vector machine (SVM) based approach for predicting a differential stuck. Also, Heinze et al (2012), Zhu et al (2019) and Alshaikh et al (2019) developed data-driven supervised models to detect stuck incident based on Decision Tree (DT), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) using the surface drilling parameters. Tripathi et al (2020) presented a hierarchical approach that consists of Fuzzy Rule Based and Random Forest classifier to identify drilling activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%