2018
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b01047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning for Analysis of Time-Resolved Luminescence Data

Abstract: Time-resolved photoluminescence is one of the most standard techniques to understand and systematically optimize the performance of optical materials and optoelectronic devices. Here, we present a machine learning code to analyze time-resolved photoluminescence data and determine the decay rate distribution of an arbitrary emitter without any a priori assumptions. To demonstrate and validate our approach, we analyze computer-generated time-resolved photoluminescence data sets and show its benefits for studying… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore applied machine-learning algorithms to distinguish the emission states in the measured spectra for our NPLs with minimal user bias. 26 We employed a specific implementation of the k-means clustering algorithm 27 available in the Python programming language. 28 This allowed us to sort the 1800 individual frames shown in Figure 2a, where the number of clusters was the only user input.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore applied machine-learning algorithms to distinguish the emission states in the measured spectra for our NPLs with minimal user bias. 26 We employed a specific implementation of the k-means clustering algorithm 27 available in the Python programming language. 28 This allowed us to sort the 1800 individual frames shown in Figure 2a, where the number of clusters was the only user input.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by recent studies on inverse design of polymers and inorganic solids [23][24][25] , as well as on using machine learning to understand PSCs' properties [26][27][28] , we present a machine-learning framework to investigate LD organic-inorganic perovskites serving as a capping layer for MAPbI 3 . We elucidate which properties of capping layers are responsible for enhancing stability, and the underlying mechanisms whereby they work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Tikhonov regularisation, LASSO and elastic net there are multiple popular methods to select the best hyper-parameter. These include the generalised- [93,120] and k-fold [131] cross validation, the C p statistic, [120,122] the L-curve [93,120] and the minimal product method. [93] Their use and a comparison of their effectiveness is more thoroughly described in the paper of Dorlhiac et al, [120] and the paper by Slavov et al [93] For the MEM, the subject of the regularisation parameter is often ill-discussed (it is hardly mentioned in the paper by Kumar et al) [128] however this was remedied in a paper by Lórenz-Fonfría and Kandori [132] where they discuss the effectiveness and use of the generalised cross validation, L-curve, Bayesian inference methods (also discussed previously by Skilling and Gull [133]) and the so-called 'discrepancy' criterion (optimising the α parameter until the χ 2 N value reaches 1).…”
Section: The Hyper-parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[93] Recently Ðorđević et al also published an open-source implementation in Python, validated using data taken by (some of) the authors of this review. [131] For the MEM, Steinbach et al [138] has published a freeware program that is still currently available and was last updated in late 2017 (it is also closed source). It is noted by us that all of these do (at present) appear to be significantly less used by the transient spectroscopy community than the implementations of Global Kinetic Models discussed in Section 3 -89 citations for the Steinbach freeware as of early 2020 according to Google Scholar, 5 for the 'PyLDM' program and 51 for the OPTIMUS program.…”
Section: Published Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 99%