2020
DOI: 10.1093/ectj/utaa014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning estimation of heterogeneous causal effects: Empirical Monte Carlo evidence

Abstract: We investigate the finite sample performance of causal machine learning estimators for heterogeneous causal effects at different aggregation levels. We employ an Empirical Monte Carlo Study that relies on arguably realistic data generation processes (DGPs) based on actual data in an observational setting. We consider 24 different DGPs, eleven different causal machine learning estimators, and three aggregation levels of the estimated effects. Four of the considered estimators perform consistently well across al… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
105
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
105
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A small but growing strand of literature puts causal machine learning estimators for heterogeneous treatment effects into practice and discusses practically relevant issues (e.g. Bertrand, Crépon, Marguerie, & Premand, 2017; Davis & Heller, 2017; Knaus, Lechner, & Strittmatter, 2020a, 2020b). However, applications that do the same for average treatment effects are currently missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small but growing strand of literature puts causal machine learning estimators for heterogeneous treatment effects into practice and discusses practically relevant issues (e.g. Bertrand, Crépon, Marguerie, & Premand, 2017; Davis & Heller, 2017; Knaus, Lechner, & Strittmatter, 2020a, 2020b). However, applications that do the same for average treatment effects are currently missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the recent methods developed in the causal machine learning literature, causal forest have gained relevance [ 95 – 97 ]. Knaus et al [ 98 ] show that causal forests perform consistently well across different data generation processes and aggregation levels. The causal forest algorithm [ 96 ] is a forest-based method for treatment effect estimation that allows for a tractable asymptotic theory and valid statistical inference extending Breiman’s random forest algorithm.…”
Section: • Artificial Neural Network: Extreme Learning Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, this literature has seen a surge of proposed methods, in particular in epidemiology and econometrics. Knaus, Lechner, and Strittmatter (2018) compare many of those methods systematically with respect to their set-up as well as their performance in a simulation exercise. One conclusion from their paper is that random forest-based estimation approaches outperform alternative estimators.…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%