2020
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.202000612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning Enables Selection of Epistatic Enzyme Mutants for Stability Against Unfolding and Detrimental Aggregation

Abstract: Machine learning (ML) has pervaded most areas of protein engineering, including stability and stereoselectivity. Using limonene epoxide hydrolase as the model enzyme and innov'SAR as the ML platform, comprising a digital signal process, we achieved high protein robustness that can resist unfolding with concomitant detrimental aggregation. Fourier transform (FT) allows us to take into account the order of the protein sequence and the nonlinear interactions between positions, and thus to grasp epistatic phenomen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…48,72 A structureindependent mutant library screening machine learning approach termed innov'SAR appeared recently. 73 The innov'SAR 37,41,74,75 pipeline applies featurization by Fouriertransforming numerical indices, which represent physicochemical and biochemical properties for each amino acid, taken from the amino acid index (AAindex) database. 76,77 After fast Fourier transform (FFT) processing, a spectral form of the protein is generated and used as the input for subsequent statistical modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48,72 A structureindependent mutant library screening machine learning approach termed innov'SAR appeared recently. 73 The innov'SAR 37,41,74,75 pipeline applies featurization by Fouriertransforming numerical indices, which represent physicochemical and biochemical properties for each amino acid, taken from the amino acid index (AAindex) database. 76,77 After fast Fourier transform (FFT) processing, a spectral form of the protein is generated and used as the input for subsequent statistical modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refinement of computational protein structure prediction using ML+MD has also been reported [heo2020]. With respect to variants that could impact protein function, several studies have used MD and ML to predict drug-resistant variants in Mycobacterium tuberculosis that is involved in tuberculosis [jama2020; mugu2021], variants that promote CTX-M9 mediated antibiotic resistance [lata2017], variants in epistatic enzyme that impact its stability and aggregation [li2021], and impacts of variants on protein binding dynamics [babb2020] or inducing the phenotypic alterations [garg2019].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generic pipeline of a protein engineering campaign supported by machine learning consists of the generation of experimental data representing sequence-phenotype pairs, and training a statistical or machine learning model to predict phenotypes from input sequences never assayed before. The phenotypic property of interest can be chosen from several features, including catalytic properties, 98,99 substrate affinity, stability, 100–102 and expression level in the host organism. Prominent examples of machine learning assisted protein engineering include membrane channel engineering, 103,104 protein structure prediction 105,106 and protein–protein interactions.…”
Section: Machine Learning In Enzyme Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%