2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.125.085503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning Discovery of Computational Model Efficacy Boundaries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in previous work [35,47], the TFY model tends to underestimate the peak (relative to KS-MD) of g(r) at low temperatures, with a corresponding error in the self diffusion coefficient. Notionally the accuracy of the TFY model appears to follow the machine learning trend of Z /Z > 0.35 [48], although it was not possible to use all models at high enough temperatures to be quantitative. In contrast, the NPA model with its improved Kohn-Sham treatment and use of a pseudopotential in (6) eliminates most of these errors except for C and V at T = 0.5 eV, elements for which we would recommend NPA for T > 2 eV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in previous work [35,47], the TFY model tends to underestimate the peak (relative to KS-MD) of g(r) at low temperatures, with a corresponding error in the self diffusion coefficient. Notionally the accuracy of the TFY model appears to follow the machine learning trend of Z /Z > 0.35 [48], although it was not possible to use all models at high enough temperatures to be quantitative. In contrast, the NPA model with its improved Kohn-Sham treatment and use of a pseudopotential in (6) eliminates most of these errors except for C and V at T = 0.5 eV, elements for which we would recommend NPA for T > 2 eV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as model complexity increases, additional parameters will be introduced inherently, and more sophisticated exchange-correlation functionals must be developed. Therefore, parameterizing solutions must be considered in tandem, such as developing and implementing machine learning (ML) techniques to quickly parameterize models [81,82] and evaluate their efficacy [83]. ML techniques may also prove useful in developing novel exchange-correlation functionals [84].…”
Section: Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid advance in machine learning (ML)-based methods offer us a new tool to address this challenge. ML is superior at finding hidden correlations and has recently been increasingly exploited in many research studies for chemistry and materials property prediction. In our previous studies, we have found that dipoles are often good ML descriptors for molecular properties, because they carry microscopic information of the electronic levels and distributions. , However, molecular dipoles are very difficult to measure in practice. The fact that vibrational spectra, such as infrared (IR) and Raman, are strongly associated with the dipole of the system under investigation seems to suggest that vibrational spectral signals could be directly used as ML descriptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%