2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2022.114150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine-learning-based video analysis of grasping behavior during recovery from cervical spinal cord injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternative assessments, such as the string test, coat hanger test, and horizontal bar test only evaluate forelimb strength and coordination, not locomotion. Additionally, machine-learning algorithms for automated unbiased analyses of these behaviors have been implemented only on a limited scale, with observations specifically focusing on hindlimb behaviors (Eisdorfer et al, 2022; Sato et al, 2022) or grasping behaviors (Duque et al, 2023; O’Neill et al, 2022). Unlike these previous applications, our study comprehensively investigated various unexplored parameters such as forelimb and tail poses, compensatory mechanisms, alterations in head position, lift and stance profiles, anxiety, and fatigue-like behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative assessments, such as the string test, coat hanger test, and horizontal bar test only evaluate forelimb strength and coordination, not locomotion. Additionally, machine-learning algorithms for automated unbiased analyses of these behaviors have been implemented only on a limited scale, with observations specifically focusing on hindlimb behaviors (Eisdorfer et al, 2022; Sato et al, 2022) or grasping behaviors (Duque et al, 2023; O’Neill et al, 2022). Unlike these previous applications, our study comprehensively investigated various unexplored parameters such as forelimb and tail poses, compensatory mechanisms, alterations in head position, lift and stance profiles, anxiety, and fatigue-like behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%