2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.110965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning based success prediction for crowdsourcing software projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Illahi et al [4] addressed the inefficiency in software development by proposing a machine learning model to predict project success, stemming from the challenges of low submission rates and high failure rates in competitive markets. Their novel approach, leveraging a modified keyword ranking algorithm, achieved an average precision of 82.64%, recall of 86.16%, and F-measure of 84.36% in predicting project success using CNN classifiers.…”
Section: Success Prediction On the Ccsd Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Illahi et al [4] addressed the inefficiency in software development by proposing a machine learning model to predict project success, stemming from the challenges of low submission rates and high failure rates in competitive markets. Their novel approach, leveraging a modified keyword ranking algorithm, achieved an average precision of 82.64%, recall of 86.16%, and F-measure of 84.36% in predicting project success using CNN classifiers.…”
Section: Success Prediction On the Ccsd Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CCSD platforms, e.g., TopCoder (https://www.topcoder.com, accessed on 15 March 2023) and Kaggle (https://www.kaggle.com, accessed on 15 March 2023) [4] rely heavily on a decentralized pool of individuals, i.e., TopCoder, with 1,735,550 members registered worldwide who participate in competitive tasks published on these platforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We are aware of potential threats to the construct validity of USA-BERT due to the choice of evaluation metrics. We employ widely adopted metrics in the research community, namely accuracy, precision, recall, and F-measure, as highlighted by Illahi et al (2019) [62]. However, it is important to acknowledge that relying heavily on these metrics may have limitations in terms of construct validity.…”
Section: E Threats To Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%