2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning-based seismic fragility and seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research results showed that the probability of significant damage to a spatially curved bridge was sensitive to the attack angles of seismic action. Kazemi et al (2023) optimization methods combined with machine learning algorithms developed in Python, thus reducing computational effort. Akbarnezhad et al (2023) evaluated the seismic fragility of a two-span RC bridge with shape memory alloy-restrained piers using machine learning techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The research results showed that the probability of significant damage to a spatially curved bridge was sensitive to the attack angles of seismic action. Kazemi et al (2023) optimization methods combined with machine learning algorithms developed in Python, thus reducing computational effort. Akbarnezhad et al (2023) evaluated the seismic fragility of a two-span RC bridge with shape memory alloy-restrained piers using machine learning techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research results showed that the probability of significant damage to a spatially curved bridge was sensitive to the attack angles of seismic action. Kazemi et al. (2023) optimization methods combined with machine learning algorithms developed in Python, thus reducing computational effort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various machine learning (ML) methods have been widely employed in structural damage assessment and fragility analysis due to they can establish complex mapping models from IMs to EDP. [24][25][26][27][28][29] Furthermore, except for the primary ground motion uncertainties in PSDM, uncertainties of structural attributes arising from geometric configuration and material properties also needs to be considered. 30,31 ML-based fragility models can more effectively reflect uncertainties in structural attributes, thereby avoiding the constraints imposed by the a priori assumptions of parameter distributions in traditional fragility analysis, such as cloud analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various machine learning (ML) methods have been widely employed in structural damage assessment and fragility analysis due to they can establish complex mapping models from IMs to EDP 24–29 . Furthermore, except for the primary ground motion uncertainties in PSDM, uncertainties of structural attributes arising from geometric configuration and material properties also needs to be considered 30,31 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jena et al [22] implemented the Long Short-Term Memory model for Geospatial Information Systems to assess the earthquake vulnerability for the whole of India. Kazemi et al [23] developed a risk assessment machine learning tool for the purpose of retrofitting and to obtain potential design strategies for RC buildings. Soleimani and Liu [24] used the ANN method for predictive PSDMs using a reputable ML approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%