2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning-based seismic damage assessment of non-ductile RC beam-column joints using visual damage indices of surface crack patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values in the fourth and sixth columns of Table 3 are calculated by multiplying the sensitivity value with the positive or negative percentage. Noteworthy to mention that previous studies have widely incorporated symbolic regression method 24,28,34,[39][40][41][42][43][44]86,96 or machine learningbased models 45,46,92,94,95 for correlating the image-derived parameters to the level of damage in the structural components. The machine learning-based models are conventionally used when very complex relationship exists between the predictors.…”
Section: Plan Iii: Modeling By Two Gfds and Aspect Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values in the fourth and sixth columns of Table 3 are calculated by multiplying the sensitivity value with the positive or negative percentage. Noteworthy to mention that previous studies have widely incorporated symbolic regression method 24,28,34,[39][40][41][42][43][44]86,96 or machine learningbased models 45,46,92,94,95 for correlating the image-derived parameters to the level of damage in the structural components. The machine learning-based models are conventionally used when very complex relationship exists between the predictors.…”
Section: Plan Iii: Modeling By Two Gfds and Aspect Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GFDs have been also incorporated for the estimation of residual stiffness, 39,43 and strength 44 in RC columns. Furthermore, Hamidia et al 45 introduced a methodology based on machine learning techniques for evaluating damage in non-ductile RCMF joints. This methodology utilizes visual damage indices such as cracking length and crushing density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fractal dimension, has been also employed by Hamidia and Gangizadeh for loss measurement 57 and residual stiffness estimation 58 of seismically damaged nonductile RCMFs. Also, Hamidia et al 59,60 employed machine learning regression models for the loss estimation of RCMFs based on information on cracking length and crushing density. All those studies have used a databank of beam-column joints where the damage is localized in the beam and joints and not in the columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding was later advanced by Mansourdehghan et al 20 to predict the performance level, peak drift ratio, and stiffness deterioration of RCSWs using the cracking length and crushing area as the input variables for the machine learning models. A similar approach was recently employed by Hamidia et al 21 to use visual damage features for predicting the peak drift ratio of beam-column joints using machine learning techniques. The study also correlated the cracking length and crushing areas to the post-earthquake damage states of beam-column subassemblies using FEMA P-58 and HAZUS guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to predict the performance level, peak drift ratio, and stiffness deterioration of RCSWs using the cracking length and crushing area as the input variables for the machine learning models. A similar approach was recently employed by Hamidia et al 21 . to use visual damage features for predicting the peak drift ratio of beam‐column joints using machine learning techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%