2021
DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning-based random forest predicts anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer

Abstract: Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the commonest and most serious complications after rectal cancer surgery. The previous analyses on predictors for AL included small-scale patients, and their prediction models performed unsatisfactorily.Methods: Clinical data of 5,220 patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer were scrutinized to create a prediction model via random forest classifier. Additionally, data of 836 patients served as the test dataset. Patients diagnosed with AL within … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RF algorithm, as an emerging machine learning algorithm, has robust operation, no requirements on data sets, and no over-fitting. It has been widely used in disease risk assessment [27]. Our results also confirm previous conclusions [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…RF algorithm, as an emerging machine learning algorithm, has robust operation, no requirements on data sets, and no over-fitting. It has been widely used in disease risk assessment [27]. Our results also confirm previous conclusions [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The area under the curve was 0.766. In another research, machine learning-based random forest predicted ALs (area under the curve = 0.87) and provided practical advice on whether to construct a temporary stoma [ 225 ]. Additionally, Sammour et al [ 226 ] validated an online risk calculator for postoperative AL prediction and examined AI-based analytics.…”
Section: Diagnostic Workupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the prediction of chemotherapy response, AUCs between 0.71 and 0.91 were discovered, accuracies varied between 71 and 84% [30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. In the machine learning group for prediction of postoperative complications, AUCs have ranged from 0.6 and 0.96, additionally, accuracies were found to be between 81 and 93% [37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. For machine learning models predicting appendicitis cases, AUCs varied from 0.91 to 0.95, and accuracies ranged between 65 and 98% [44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Predictive Performancementioning
confidence: 99%