2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-018-0966-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning-based radiomic models to predict intensity-modulated radiation therapy response, Gleason score and stage in prostate cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radiomics is a new era of science which faces many challenges, including image acquisition (22), reconstruction (23,24), processing (25), and model development (26,27) to provide robust and reproducible models. Previous studies have shown that the radiomics signature is valuable for differentiating high/low grade ccRCC tumors (28,29).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiomics is a new era of science which faces many challenges, including image acquisition (22), reconstruction (23,24), processing (25), and model development (26,27) to provide robust and reproducible models. Previous studies have shown that the radiomics signature is valuable for differentiating high/low grade ccRCC tumors (28,29).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning (ML) is a subset of AI, providing a promising tool for the development of diagnostic, prognostic and predictive modelling tools from multimodality medical image data [19,20]. The combination of image-derived features and ML algorithms are used to build more accurate models in the era of precision medicine [21]. It is hypothesized that conventional diagnostic methods of many diseases could be replaced by ML radiomics in the future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the impact of MR image pre-processing and combining regions with differing MLs on the prediction of tumor MGMT mutation status was evaluated. However, this field lacks a comprehensive guideline for the optimal usage of robots features (39)(40)(41), classifiers (14). Therefore, this study attempted to determine the best classifier and feature selector for such investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%