2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning-based predictive modeling of contact heat transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the first-principles calculation method is computationally demanding and time consuming. In recent years, machine learning has emerged as a novel approach for TBR prediction [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57], and it has been demonstrated to achieve higher predictive accuracy than the conventionally used AMM and DMM methods [48]. Figure 3b shows the comparison of the correlation between the experimental values and the values predicted by the AMM, DMM, and machine learning method using Gaussian process regression (GPR).…”
Section: Theoretical and Computational Methods For Tbr Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the first-principles calculation method is computationally demanding and time consuming. In recent years, machine learning has emerged as a novel approach for TBR prediction [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57], and it has been demonstrated to achieve higher predictive accuracy than the conventionally used AMM and DMM methods [48]. Figure 3b shows the comparison of the correlation between the experimental values and the values predicted by the AMM, DMM, and machine learning method using Gaussian process regression (GPR).…”
Section: Theoretical and Computational Methods For Tbr Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction of thermal boundary resistance by using linear regression, decision tree, random forest algorithm, and machine-learning potential-driven molecular dynamics simulations. Reprinted with permission from refs and . Copyright 2021 Elsevier and 2021 Springer Nature.…”
Section: Thermophysical Properties Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even for the same pair of interface materials, ML can also be applied to study the dependence of interface conditions such as temperature, defects, bonding strength, etc. Vu et al constructed the mapping between the TBR of a glass/steel interface and descriptors including temperature, pressure, and surface roughness by using linear regression, decision tree, and random forest algorithm to train their own experimental results and achieved a coefficient of determination up to 0.99, as illustrated in Figure c . In addition, ML algorithms can also be combined with classical MD simulations to accelerate the optimization of fine structure at the interface for thermal transport. …”
Section: Thermophysical Properties Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is influenced both by process parameters, e.g. temperature and molding force (e.g., Maxwell [15,16] or Burgers' models [17,18]), the heat transfers at the glassmold interface [19][20][21] and by system variables such as the geometry of the blank and that of the mold, as well as the surface properties [22]. Another challenge is the control of shrinkage, which is also significantly influenced by thermal and system parameters [23].…”
Section: Fig 4 Process Chain Of the Wafer Scale Processmentioning
confidence: 99%